From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKRTc-0005bd-Cw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:01:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24239E02F4; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.tmcs.ch (unknown [213.131.245.113]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF90EE02F4 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 06:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (1-151.3-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.3.151.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.tmcs.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B71F12F434B for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:01:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [v4] Planning for automatic assignment computation of bugs From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20090104180608.2e0935e5@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20081019060114.GA21785@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200901041752.38316.rbu@gentoo.org> <4960EB9D.6030808@gentoo.org> <20090104180608.2e0935e5@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lVZusidikowgWJfPXOw1" Organization: Gentoo Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:01:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1231308067.2013.36.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 X-Archives-Salt: 1562acb3-c935-41dd-af5f-8290a836c752 X-Archives-Hash: 1329d39d16ca02980a4ad933ed9c015b --=-lVZusidikowgWJfPXOw1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sonntag, den 04.01.2009, 18:06 +0100 schrieb Jeroen Roovers: > On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 17:02:21 +0000 > Mike Auty wrote: >=20 > > According to [1], "When the file lists multiple entries, then you > > assign the bug to the first maintainer, and CC the other > > maintainer(s) and herd(s)." So it looks as though the file should go > > through the maintainers first and herds second? Should be pretty > > easy to fix... >=20 > I spotted that too but didn't remember putting it in black and white. :) >=20 > The order ("first maintainer as assignee" or "first maintainer/herd as > assignee") is open to discussion and I think this is the proper forum to > have that discussion. I'd say that the correct way to fix this is to fix the metadata schema to be able to write something like this: foo adev bar or foo adev bar Because having to write this: foo adev@gentoo.org bar is just nonsense. Cheers, Tiziano --=20 =EF=BB=BF------------------------------------------------------- Tiziano M=C3=BCller Gentoo Linux Developer Areas of responsibility: Samba, PostgreSQL, CPP, Python, sysadmin E-Mail : dev-zero@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : F327 283A E769 2E36 18D5 4DE2 1B05 6A63 AE9C 1E30 --=-lVZusidikowgWJfPXOw1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklkRSMACgkQGwVqY66cHjCKigCdHqegzDFhX+Nz1qF2mbBQBSS5 ZRIAniF9YmjLL1p+m6Tvcyvg2edRttII =L+vi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lVZusidikowgWJfPXOw1--