From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33815-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1LFEps-0005fM-Kr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:30:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 40226E05E9; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B80AE05E9 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.101.101.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256B564A1A for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] status of ruby 1.8.7? From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200812171248.58742.hanno@gentoo.org> References: <200812171248.58742.hanno@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wee+Gp4KYmSR0QEgxWwZ" Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:30:34 +0100 Message-Id: <1230067835.7588.3.camel@ip6-localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 X-Archives-Salt: 4b5463cf-eea5-4480-81a1-ef3a1642d9be X-Archives-Hash: 8a397fa5ce0ca5f8ad001dc1012152b9 --=-wee+Gp4KYmSR0QEgxWwZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 12:48 +0100, Hanno B=C3=B6ck wrote: > Hi, >=20 > We have ruby 1.8.7 in the tree masked since April. >=20 > # Richard Brown <rbrown@gentoo.org> (16 Apr 2008) > # Masked for test > =3Ddev-lang/ruby-1.8.7* >=20 > There's no tracker bug or anything alike about the status of unmasking, s= o I=20 > wanted to ask what's the status here. Hanno also opened a bug and I've responded there: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D252257 > Beside, I'd like to repeat that I think it's a very bad idea to add new=20 > packages to package.mask "for testing" without any further information.=20 > Usually a tracker bug is a good idea, but any other note where to find=20 > information what needs to be done to get things ready is fine. Agreed. This was an old mask from before the recent discussion about this. I've updated the package.mask information accordingly. Kind regards, Hans --=-wee+Gp4KYmSR0QEgxWwZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklRWHoACgkQqj4ysMWt/vtMFACgu8WD6EfFno01T/6ENb+zoVuK AFgAnAt3RiC1aHnByi7HJGAw7W3JtANV =md4a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wee+Gp4KYmSR0QEgxWwZ--