From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9qNI-0006qC-0Z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2008 00:22:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50B92E052F; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39269E052F for ; Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from TesterServ.TesterNet ([70.83.102.254]) by VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0KBL0031P2CGMBD0@VL-MO-MR005.ip.videotron.ca> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:21:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from modemcable106.102-201-24.mc.videotron.ca ([24.201.102.106] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by TesterServ.TesterNet with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L9qN3-0008Fp-AM for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:22:37 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 policy for portage tree From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-reply-to: <20081209001123.16281209@snowmobile> References: <493DB50A.8090403@jmhengen.net> <1228781390.7351.2.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> <20081209001123.16281209@snowmobile> Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qmRiP4vdTL/fupC2oDa5" Organization: Gentoo Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:25:44 -0500 Message-id: <1228782344.7351.5.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Archives-Salt: 594e40af-e403-4a6f-9b57-6186d5205e0f X-Archives-Hash: 0507970d119044284666a42b072de5a5 --=-qmRiP4vdTL/fupC2oDa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 00:11 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 19:09:50 -0500 > Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > > I'd like to go further and ask that for the next EAPI change, we only > > allow ebuilds using it into the tree once a version of portage that > > supports it has gone stable. And then, not make any ebuild with the > > new EAPI stable for 60 more days so that the new EAPI related code in > > portage can be tested properly. >=20 > The "can be tested properly" phase is when it's in ~arch... That also means that to pull a significant number of ebuilds it forces mostly everyone to test it.. and that part is annoying.. The testing should be two phased, the first for regression (against existing ebuilds), and once thats stable, then we can test with new ebuilds... --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-qmRiP4vdTL/fupC2oDa5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk9uwgACgkQHTiOWk7ZorvkZwCfWgKVOX1fYOP7ck2XzCqbupqB 7Y4An3ZIZ1anMTJm/Lvv/beZwhItWIk6 =WcJp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qmRiP4vdTL/fupC2oDa5--