From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0ft5-0003ya-MR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:21:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4582E02CD; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.libexec.de (omega.libexec.de [85.214.68.240]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA0FE02CD for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67815400F for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:18:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at libexec.de Received: from mail.libexec.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (omega.libexec.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fTiQC7r6ng+z for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:18:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (dslb-088-076-174-194.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.76.174.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: tobias) by mail.libexec.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D85AC4002 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:18:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] An official Gentoo wiki From: Tobias Scherbaum To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20081112002116.12e12ac2@snowmobile> References: <20081111234532.GG7038@aerie.halcy0n.com> <20081112002116.12e12ac2@snowmobile> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9NFxgzeJW9rEZDIiqx9P" Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:21:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1226596898.3918.4.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 X-Archives-Salt: 277735f3-d710-46b5-9ed1-3c57217d8ce2 X-Archives-Hash: 3996456a80b680c713f8600c3e96acd9 --=-9NFxgzeJW9rEZDIiqx9P Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500 > Mark Loeser wrote: > > What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having > > a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us > > having a wiki? >=20 > What will policy on articles that are horribly dangerous or outright > wrong? Is Gentoo prepared to block or warn about articles that recommend > stupid things? If a warning is used, what will be used to distinguish > between a generic "wiki, not necessarily checked by sane people" and a > "article known to be horrible"? Wikipedia started using an extension for marking pages as "validated". See [1]. This would allow us to setup a group of "trusted people" (developers, long-time users, well-known contributors - for example) who would be able to review pages and tag them that way. Non-reviewed pages could show a header then clearly stating that this specific page hasn't been reviewed and might contain inaccurate information. Tobias [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:FlaggedRevs --=-9NFxgzeJW9rEZDIiqx9P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkcYiIACgkQX2bdwDDA8AU0zACfc8bXLd5mOrc8+phKGNzW0OsZ ah4An2RCZ08b2AuvEig0gWOTUwemuUbs =f/sg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9NFxgzeJW9rEZDIiqx9P--