From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KzCDt-0005FO-Og for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:29:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11087E0327; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:29:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02D2E0327 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [77.246.104.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF1D65545 for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DEFAULT_* proposal From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20081109140437.GA5200@spoc> References: <20081108222051.GA7464@spoc> <1226234352.27750.175.camel@localhost> <20081109140437.GA5200@spoc> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:28:39 +0300 Message-Id: <1226244519.27750.212.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: aed3a7dd-2894-47ca-b4ef-b4061ba7516f X-Archives-Hash: 25c88cad8b7d62c5bb337af6ca3d0fd1 Well for myself I found compromise. Although in both proposals as I see you've omitted part where you'll discuss how you are going to implement this feature, implementing this feature as eclass addresses most of my concerns, since: 1. ebuild's syntax does not change 2. people will have to inherit some.eclass to use them and thus will do this only when it's really saves time/efforts I've dropped all other answers I was going to give you since I started to feel that this is just another cycle. We can discuss them off list if necessary. :) -- Peter.