From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33323-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KwwZq-0002ye-Hm
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:22:30 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4130EE03FD;
	Mon,  3 Nov 2008 10:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1637BE03FD
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  3 Nov 2008 10:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [77.246.104.171])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B6F647E2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  3 Nov 2008 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] Add RESTRICT="distcc" capability
From: Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <200811021111.10124.gengor@gentoo.org>
References: <200811011357.17258.gengor@gentoo.org>
	 <200811011829.03758.gengor@gentoo.org> <20081102112614.00851d36@snowmobile>
	 <200811021111.10124.gengor@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:22:12 +0300
Message-Id: <1225707732.1775.46.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: b907e37c-bfa5-448d-af87-2c5d345d5ef3
X-Archives-Hash: 85de2fe6c2254ab0689539a57225cfde

=D0=92 =D0=92=D1=81=D0=BA, 02/11/2008 =D0=B2 12:11 -0700, Gordon Malm =D0=
=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> You can cry "abuse" all you want.  You FAIL to offer any alternatives o=
r=20
> solutions.  I'll ask again, how do you detect that you are compiling co=
de=20
> destined to be run in-kernel from within gcc without checking for the=20
> __KERNEL__ macro?  I think we both know the answer.

Gordon, as far as I see our linux-mod.eclass builds each kernel module
separately and it is possible to modify it to pass CFLAGS you wish for
kernel modules only and as such avoid using __KERNEL__ macro for this...

--=20
Peter.