From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KwJRl-0002Xu-B3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:35:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AD17E0418; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.37]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0FFE0418 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 16:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E3A1DE8A6 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:35:30 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at estpak.ee Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (MXR-5.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdNZxrU0URW2 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:35:29 +0200 (EET) Received: from Relayhost3.neti.ee (relayhost3.estpak.ee [88.196.174.169]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403CB1DE6C8 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 18:35:29 +0200 (EET) X-SMTP-Auth-NETI-Businesmail: no Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding lxde-base category From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <490C3812.4060700@gentoo.org> References: <490C3812.4060700@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-WFg799N731cM5bnj1xJZ" Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:33:56 +0200 Message-Id: <1225557236.12321.5.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 X-Archives-Salt: b8879312-303f-44db-a4a5-0e6181ea74d4 X-Archives-Hash: b464571fefd0b017bce5f992ec1dce53 --=-WFg799N731cM5bnj1xJZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 12:05 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I would like to add a new category to the tree: lxde-base, to be used > for the LXDE desktop [1,2] packages, in correspondence to the categories > for the other desktop environments we have (gnome, kde, xfce). With the > help of a few users I have been developing ebuilds for these packages in > the lxde overlay [3], and I would like to move the ebuilds for the > release versions into the official tree now. (The overlay also contains > live svn ebuilds.) ++ Note that I will propose to the GNOME team to reorganize the GNOME categories to gnome-platform/, gnome-desktop/, gnome-dev/, gnome-bindings/ or similar setup once we have atomic commits to the portage tree (a la git) to not disrupt anything from all the moves. But I think with just 14 packages an lxde-base makes the most sense indeed, with upstream probably not having them categorized themselves like GNOME has. --=20 Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: leio@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio --=-WFg799N731cM5bnj1xJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkMhPQACgkQkeYb6olFHJcwdACgsAjwme8OQAk9s5rswutc/B74 YnYAnArUcysg8AwvzeFNgqtRgW9ZOnv6 =L8E8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-WFg799N731cM5bnj1xJZ--