From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33281-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Kw4fE-0007i4-Aq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:48:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13134E0364; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.37]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE59E0364 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:48:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A291DF9A4 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:48:24 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at estpak.ee Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (MXR-5.estpak.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ZoV+CI+etDP for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:48:23 +0200 (EET) Received: from Relayhost1.neti.ee (Relayhost1 [88.196.174.141]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384C61DF896 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 02:48:23 +0200 (EET) X-SMTP-Auth-NETI-Businesmail: no Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <490BA15D.3070005@gentoo.org> References: <490B1BCB.1020008@gentoo.org> <20081031200105.GU27606@mephisto> <490B7D9F.60107@gentoo.org> <1225498689.9587.1.camel@localhost> <490BA15D.3070005@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Ww2W/WbIEBeCjF2kf6tQ" Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:46:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1225500414.9587.7.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 X-Archives-Salt: 37ff5727-6875-46f4-8687-db3dbba8a0fb X-Archives-Hash: 0f9b2728881379fbdc6864de66068b49 --=-Ww2W/WbIEBeCjF2kf6tQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > >> Michael Hammer wrote: > >>> * Doug Goldstein <cardoe@gentoo.org> [081031 15:53]: > >>>> If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. > >>> ++ > >> I was also wondering why kerberos was on by default - I definitely > >> approve of nuking it. > >=20 > > I'm believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's. > > They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires > > evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=3Dkerberos > > They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get > > things like GRP packages to work right. >=20 > If that's the case, then I say whack it from global USE and change it to = an IUSE=20 > default (or whatever is in vogue these days) for eds. =46rom GNOME teams perspective I don't believe that is a good idea. Users wanting exchange support aren't hardly the majority of evolution users. --=20 Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: leio@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio --=-Ww2W/WbIEBeCjF2kf6tQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkkLpv4ACgkQkeYb6olFHJfiAACfbSjNNCw22urUygjzYRZLomje H44AoMJqEYw5TgiX3OBUsZLnVygTWtIu =rYQz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Ww2W/WbIEBeCjF2kf6tQ--