* [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? @ 2008-10-12 17:04 Thomas Sachau 2008-10-12 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan 2008-10-13 19:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Thomas Sachau @ 2008-10-12 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 488 bytes --] I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also see ebuilds depending on them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about removing different packages from the system set. So now my question is: Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should we leave the system packages out completly? -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 315 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: System packages in (R)DEPEND? 2008-10-12 17:04 [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? Thomas Sachau @ 2008-10-12 19:48 ` Duncan 2008-10-13 19:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Duncan @ 2008-10-12 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> posted 48F22E15.5050604@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:04:21 +0200: > I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i > also see ebuilds depending on them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) > that there where discussions about removing different packages from the > system set. So now my question is: > > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some > packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should > we leave the system packages out completly? The idea has been to reduce the system set, but packages coming out of it will of necessity need to be widely known. Meanwhile, in general, the system set should be reasonable to rely on in general. The cases where system packages are in depends should generally be limited to those in which it's necessary to resolve circular dependencies, with the help of USE=build and boostrap, or to other special cases (like a dependency on a specific USE flag on a system package, or where not all profiles may depend on the same system packages, etc). IOW, "normal" packages shouldn't need to specify "normal" dependencies on system packages. At least, that's how I've read the discussion I've seen to date. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? 2008-10-12 17:04 [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? Thomas Sachau 2008-10-12 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan @ 2008-10-13 19:34 ` Jeremy Olexa 2008-10-14 13:28 ` Peter Volkov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jeremy Olexa @ 2008-10-13 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> wrote: > I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also see ebuilds depending on > them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about removing different > packages from the system set. So now my question is: > > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some packages, because they could be > removed? If yes, which ones? Or should we leave the system packages out completly? In my quick 30 seconds of searching I found at least one bug on this very issue. You may find more if you look for them. ;) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221311 Please provide reasons/justifications for the proposal of removing packages from the system set or from the ebuilds instead of just raising random questions (which end up with no results and hence just "noise"). -Jeremy ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? 2008-10-13 19:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa @ 2008-10-14 13:28 ` Peter Volkov 2008-10-15 9:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Peter Volkov @ 2008-10-14 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev В Пнд, 13/10/2008 в 14:34 -0500, Jeremy Olexa пишет: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some packages, because they could be > > removed? If yes, which ones? Or should we leave the system packages out completly? > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221311 > > Please provide reasons/justifications for the proposal of removing Our documentation, QA team insist that we should not depend on system packages and there are good reasons to do that. But still above bug clearly states different. Also if we consider perl and some other packages, they also could became target to be removed... But I'm not going to repeat discussion we already had recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/54035 So yes, there is ambiguity and the question is valid. But since we had discussion recently I don't see what else we can discuss now. -- Peter. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: System packages in (R)DEPEND? 2008-10-14 13:28 ` Peter Volkov @ 2008-10-15 9:07 ` Steve Long 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Steve Long @ 2008-10-15 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Peter Volkov wrote: > Jeremy Olexa ?????: >> Thomas Sachau wrote: >> > Should we depend on all system packages? Should we depend on some >> > packages, because they could be removed? If yes, which ones? Or should >> > we leave the system packages out completly? >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221311 >> >> Please provide reasons/justifications for the proposal of removing > > Our documentation, QA team insist that we should not depend on system > packages and there are good reasons to do that. But still above bug > clearly states different. Also if we consider perl and some other > packages, they also could became target to be removed... But I'm not > going to repeat discussion we already had recently: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/54035 > > So yes, there is ambiguity and the question is valid. But since we had > discussion recently I don't see what else we can discuss now. > Well according to [1] it should all be done in the profiles, and [2] seems like a good way to accomplish a more effective split. Is there anything which means portage can't simply move ahead with that? [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/54146 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.portage.devel/2575 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-15 9:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-10-12 17:04 [gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND? Thomas Sachau 2008-10-12 19:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan 2008-10-13 19:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeremy Olexa 2008-10-14 13:28 ` Peter Volkov 2008-10-15 9:07 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox