From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-31711-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KAQkt-00081B-2j
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:41:23 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A25D7E0455;
	Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from relay.two-pebbles.com (relay.two-pebbles.com [91.186.24.167])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B59EE0455
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:41:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by relay.two-pebbles.com with esmtpsa 
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:41:42 +0100
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86
	commit	in	profiles: package.mask
From: Peter Weller <welp@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <485E5851.2090008@gentoo.org>
References: <E1K9RI1-0004c7-5K@stork.gentoo.org>
	 <1214030610.28865.8.camel@camobap>  <1214038611.25133.0.camel@localhost>
	 <1214128672.28865.86.camel@camobap>  <485E5851.2090008@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:41:08 +0100
Message-Id: <1214145669.15137.2.camel@marx>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: f80fd8e6-d21a-449e-bea9-7ac066a47f6e
X-Archives-Hash: 083988c59863d17e5f1eebdc9c86c14e

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 15:49 +0200, Alin Nstac wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
> > В Сбт, 21/06/2008 в 10:56 +0200, Albert Zeyer пишет:
> >   
> >> Perhaps install a script which automatically takes the CVS comment when
> >> some of these files is changed and adds this comment automatically to
> >> the ChangeLog?
> >>     
> >
> > Some days ago Diego (flameeyes) suggested to write script which will
> > abort commit in case ChangeLog is not filled. Taking into account a
> > number (about 1 commit per day(!)) of developers who forgive to use
> > echangelog I think this is the only way to go if we want that
> > ChangeLog's to be useful...
> >
> >   
> How about fixing the right problem instead forcing devs to complete yet 
> another step?
> The right way of fixing that is by creating changelogs automatically, 
> based on cvs commit comments.
> 
Possibly by making it a part of the whole repoman commit process? I'm
pretty sure I've mentioned this in a council meeting:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20080508-summary.txt
(Check the 'New Topics' -> 'When are ChangeLog entries required?'
summary)

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list