From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K7r8B-0002ss-M7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:14:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CC5AE0268; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01.mail.mbr-roch.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.140]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301AEE0268 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=spike) by smarthost01.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K7r89-0006i3-CJ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:14:45 +0000 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:14:31 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1212776862.2215.13.camel@liasis.inforead.com> X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.22 Message-Id: <1213532084.2890.0@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost01-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: 838d3d7a-83dd-42f5-9ffb-652c6f843d6d X-Archives-Hash: 0d98608e21a791b43862ff1c721581f3 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2008.06.06 19:27, Ferris McCormick wrote: > I also nominate: > NeddySeagoon >=20 > Regards, > Ferris > --=20 > Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) > Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) >=20 Ladies and Gentlemen, After a week of deliberation, I've decided to decline my council=20 nomination. The existing council have been doing a good job and judging by=20 Thursdays meeting have successfully addressed the meeting length=20 problem. This election, triggered by a possible cock up can be turned=20 to Gentoos advantage by re-electing the current council. Such a result will provide both continuity and stability which can only=20 be good for Gentoo. If you were thinking of voting for me, please vote=20 for the outgoing council members instead. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhVB7QACgkQTE4/y7nJvav/igCfRw9tP05Ng8P3t5yYSHcYS1UB n4YAn11bQYnBCOw3JLO89X7DIRPg3PqB =3DNjNp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list