From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2KgO-0001f3-MF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:35:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D49EFE0417; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB27E0417 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:35:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (unknown [77.246.104.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D23165EB4 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 06:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20080531032837.GE6931@seldon.metaweb.com> References: <20080531021748.4dd0b78e@snowcone> <20080531014356.GB6931@seldon.metaweb.com> <20080531025020.7d7da9d7@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0805301908sec8a9dale54c1696b5a0dccc@mail.gmail.com> <20080531031432.24169d4c@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0805301923v73ee15eds92d525f97a0e2c4b@mail.gmail.com> <20080531033319.02d42034@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0805301958x6ea98788l77983b10756f0da4@mail.gmail.com> <20080531040300.475efef6@snowcone> <8b4c83ad0805302015y2f408626rd479dde4f578badf@mail.gmail.com> <20080531032837.GE6931@seldon.metaweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 10:25:51 +0400 Message-Id: <1212215151.17218.9.camel@camobap> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c5e21b32-5aad-4cb6-b272-61cff9e39819 X-Archives-Hash: c1f2a255399def7b1b7f734f3aa4670b =D0=92 =D0=9F=D1=82=D0=BD, 30/05/2008 =D0=B2 20:28 -0700, Brian Harring =D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Either way, basically it's coming down to if gentoo wants to follow=20 > the definition of 'academic' right, or 'pragmatic' right. Exempting=20 > ciaran, vote seems to be pragmatic. Well, although I've asked about problems with having --as-needed by default, I'd better go with academic. C++ is quite common language to ignore its design problems and in the end it's not hard to define LDFLAGS in make.conf. --=20 Peter. --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list