From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtmBA-0000P3-Bn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:07:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB78AE07BE; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.40]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4AAE07BE for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.59]) by QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Nf6G1Z01v1GXsucA402U00; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:07:33 +0000 Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([24.6.168.204]) by OMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ng7d1Z0054Qw7hC8T00000; Wed, 07 May 2008 16:07:37 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=3Q1XZgPY7ywA:10 a=7mOBRU54AAAA:8 a=rGfeDPLMwLrtfX_SaA4A:9 a=WzGvuyz5O4Dh6MQLIKgA:7 a=iRA6ZNPXdY93ObtOVWQlMNyisTYA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=JrI1QrztSLK2mVXYi9AA:9 a=341TW_du4346kL9AKiTZMUDMKX0A:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B0F17B8021 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:07:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzTc6ouerF1r for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inertia.localdomain (inertia.wlan.twi-31o2.org [192.168.1.50]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DF017B8010 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by inertia.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 984AB890254; Wed, 7 May 2008 09:06:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XGiPXkkTAIVv7oIwake5" Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:06:21 -0700 Message-Id: <1210176381.15938.15.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 X-Archives-Salt: 197da0d5-f8d1-4ddb-8a60-0a865230bf60 X-Archives-Hash: 1521b7814824d70ea650033f85d0fccb --=-XGiPXkkTAIVv7oIwake5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I do realize one would remove build-time dependencies and the toolchain > on an embedded system on deployment anyway, but this means gcc USE=3Dnocx= x > USE flag is pretty much useless, while it would be nice to use it to > ensure that nothing sneaks in during development that depends on the C++ > standard library easily instead of finding things break later. It's a pain in the ass for Release Engineering, too. At this point, we're looking into how we need to modify the bootstrap sequence to accommodate people using lzma for system (and lower) packages. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220074 We're already getting reports of this due to someone deciding that it'd be a good idea to use lzma for our daily portage snapshots without any discussion here. Luckily, we still have the other tarballs to use, too. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Games Developer --=-XGiPXkkTAIVv7oIwake5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkgh030ACgkQkT4lNIS36YEZ8wCcCnvwD7jqkk6hzZQ90zCMQcAp uPYAoMWNE/rKdAdOYPnd4zfPXVkqeYhQ =FYZv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XGiPXkkTAIVv7oIwake5-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list