From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30588-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JtkNL-0004WF-3M
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 14:12:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72688E0596;
Wed, 7 May 2008 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E0CE0596
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 7 May 2008 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so340256fks.2
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=rcaRA30S4o6dyq6cThBVyBiwC44dPDtW6BgMN83q7Vs=;
b=DUmD09EXZCL5agSmGJC5ZCM0rkTP6b2AdnPK99oWaunU25mzZOuXp4MZVCq8BQmUNWJVZldNuAphpUdUAAwnP4KiJB+ZRIjslIjwFQQl1skVF6wPoyFS1HbTKrGDxYUVVLCzZxJ2VaDbEVzozgdo56DKEFLsnOOOJzS9bf6VOlc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding;
b=Xwq7N5hbLUhruy+Bsj71OujRyHDN81Pv8SSflozijkRsnhMMJ/dj0MDPNZ78TTB58TwnNQ0mqNj/UuGv7yeuNokN1atjahFfucUSBcLaqjnPLUkEfOk8RBenQYeBpIiSmCZgk/+heKOe82Y5/umyyEmIxpWcAU8lAC9PPBkg4P4=
Received: by 10.82.175.7 with SMTP id x7mr201446bue.35.1210169524455;
Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.65.1.5? ( [90.149.180.251])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm17712932nfv.5.2008.05.07.07.12.02
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage
From: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:12:00 +0200
Message-Id: <1210169520.1464.16.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 24082737-cacd-4420-8762-df2a25b40cbd
X-Archives-Hash: 095f28a93d9cbf789f8a844d491ec8d9
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
> does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
> in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
> kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please
> consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not
> roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can.
busybox has unlzma and seems to be a part of "system".
Should also be easy to create a really tiny unlzma from the busybox
source and ship with portage, or create a patch for tar or something.
-nc
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list