From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtkNL-0004WF-3M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 14:12:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72688E0596; Wed, 7 May 2008 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.186]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E0CE0596 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so340256fks.2 for ; Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rcaRA30S4o6dyq6cThBVyBiwC44dPDtW6BgMN83q7Vs=; b=DUmD09EXZCL5agSmGJC5ZCM0rkTP6b2AdnPK99oWaunU25mzZOuXp4MZVCq8BQmUNWJVZldNuAphpUdUAAwnP4KiJB+ZRIjslIjwFQQl1skVF6wPoyFS1HbTKrGDxYUVVLCzZxJ2VaDbEVzozgdo56DKEFLsnOOOJzS9bf6VOlc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Xwq7N5hbLUhruy+Bsj71OujRyHDN81Pv8SSflozijkRsnhMMJ/dj0MDPNZ78TTB58TwnNQ0mqNj/UuGv7yeuNokN1atjahFfucUSBcLaqjnPLUkEfOk8RBenQYeBpIiSmCZgk/+heKOe82Y5/umyyEmIxpWcAU8lAC9PPBkg4P4= Received: by 10.82.175.7 with SMTP id x7mr201446bue.35.1210169524455; Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.65.1.5? ( [90.149.180.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm17712932nfv.5.2008.05.07.07.12.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 07 May 2008 07:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage From: Natanael Copa To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> References: <1210166592.19574.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:12:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1210169520.1464.16.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 24082737-cacd-4420-8762-df2a25b40cbd X-Archives-Hash: 095f28a93d9cbf789f8a844d491ec8d9 On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that > does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done > in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple > kilobytes of code for the unpacking from a VFS. Meanwhile please > consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not > roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can. busybox has unlzma and seems to be a part of "system". Should also be easy to create a really tiny unlzma from the busybox source and ship with portage, or create a patch for tar or something. -nc -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list