From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JpQHV-0008LX-No for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:56:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D4FBE07BC; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A4D1E07BC for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.100.185.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC6E66BF8 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unmasking db 4.6 From: Hans de Graaff To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <43389.192.168.2.159.1209125934.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> References: <43389.192.168.2.159.1209125934.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xl3nG+M9+yoa8nLj0qD6" Organization: Gentoo Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:56:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1209138966.5378.1.camel@ip6-localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 X-Archives-Salt: 541c945c-8eba-45ed-a643-9f952dfaf1f4 X-Archives-Hash: 4e8a16af68203fee02d30ee3156579d1 --=-xl3nG+M9+yoa8nLj0qD6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 08:18 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote: > Does anyone have any objections to unmasking db 4.6.21? It's been in por= tage now > for a long time, but was quickly masked when some packages had some issue= s with it.=20 > The only remaining package that has an issue that I'm aware of is openlda= p, and I've > submitted a patch that makes openldap just use a lower installed db versi= on. >=20 > Any other packages that need looked at, or does anyone else have thoughts= or > objections? Most likely it will cause problems for XEmacs, which will probably be easy to solve with some configure script tweaking. I've put testing it on my todo list. Kind regards, Hans --=-xl3nG+M9+yoa8nLj0qD6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIEf8WQUozDL2JlH4RAowgAJ4vkPH8TLvnI7RK7560yOgATRu8xwCfZVn8 oDvFs3c9p8ol7dr1yL+QcmU= =13fd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xl3nG+M9+yoa8nLj0qD6-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list