From: Peter Weller <welp@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: keyring
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:11:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1208715068.15500.28.camel@marx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208712963.13942.6.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net>
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 19:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit :
> > On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing
> > > arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional
> > > for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like
> > > programs are optional deps of another package in portage. Let's not cast
> > > a simple change into breakage for users already using it (even in
> > > stable, and yes I'm lazy :D).
> >
> > Lazy is the word.
> > I cannot argue with this one, I just know that it won't be the gnome
> > herd who do the work when the time come to fix this (resolve
> > conflict).
> > The gnome herd will re-introduce the lazy ticket, and make other herd
> > use yet another confusing USE flag.
> > This is not the right way to maintain long term constants.
>
> failure, you tried to argue ;)
>
> > You asked for objections... You got some.
> >
> > You can leave this local USE flag, and stay with generic term.
> > Or you can rename it when it goes global so it have proper name.
> > You can also ignore this and force gnome onto all users.
>
> Seriously though, when I find stuff to fix, I try to fix it. I just
> don't see anything to fix right now.
There are currently three options in my mind: to rename the USE flag as
'gnome-keyring', to just globalize the 'keyring' USE flag as is, or to
remove the USE flag completely. Each have a number of downs and ups:
Renaming
1) We have to change 9 ebuilds to reflect the change
2) Almost all Gnome users will be affected in one way or another
3) Technically correct
4) Reduces chances of future collisions
5) More work for developers
Keeping it as is
1) Less headache for Gnome users in the short term (but possibly
more if we rename it in the future
2) Less work for me/Gnome herd
3) Technically incorrect
4) Could result in conflicts in the future
Removing
1) Nice and simple. Just force all packages to compile with
--gnome-keyring
2) A large number of users will probably start complaining about
all their packages being compiled with gnome-keyring support
3) Xfce people will hate hate hate, I will be crucified.
After consideration of the above, and consultation with the Gnome herd,
I think that the best option would be to rename the USE flag to
gnome-keyring.
If anyone has any objections to *that*, pipe up before tomorrow evening.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-20 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-20 14:45 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: keyring Peter Weller
2008-04-20 15:26 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2008-04-20 15:29 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-04-20 15:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ali Polatel
2008-04-20 15:44 ` Peter Weller
2008-04-20 16:00 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-04-20 16:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Tiziano Müller
2008-04-20 16:11 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-04-20 16:58 ` Mike Auty
2008-04-20 16:17 ` Peter Weller
2008-04-20 16:56 ` Santiago M. Mola
2008-04-21 4:05 ` Jeroen Roovers
2008-04-21 14:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2008-04-21 15:28 ` Jeroen Roovers
2008-04-23 1:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2008-04-20 17:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Gilles Dartiguelongue
2008-04-20 17:25 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-04-20 17:36 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2008-04-20 18:11 ` Peter Weller [this message]
2008-04-20 18:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2008-04-21 17:39 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Weller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1208715068.15500.28.camel@marx \
--to=welp@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox