From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JgH88-0002Ye-24 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:20:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5702EE0510; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32294E0510 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.4] (unknown [79.139.139.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C8066939 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200803301544.55878.vapier@gentoo.org> <20080330211844.GB32327@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200803302039.14615.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-O6nLZOeiVv0JTs0fPbPP" Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:15:45 +0400 Message-Id: <1206958545.9865.41.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 X-Archives-Salt: 26071b96-e5f9-41fc-86c9-41105acb9c41 X-Archives-Hash: 5c98ccfae388ade5802077729fcaee79 --=-O6nLZOeiVv0JTs0fPbPP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D0=9F=D0=BD=D0=B4, 31/03/2008 =D0=B2 06:21 +0000, Duncan =D0=BF=D0= =B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Mike Frysinger posted > 200803302039.14615.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar > 2008 20:39:14 -0400: >=20 > > there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely > > doable from a user perspective, just having it in the ebuild makes my > > life and users' lives easier. i'm using it in packages that tend to > > have a lot of extraneous patchsets associated with them. the random > > patches were punted from ebuilds and now it's up to the user to maintai= n > > the feature sets. > The point here though is that particularly for the glib patch, which has=20 > undergone several rounds of testing and looks set for another round or=20 > two at least, this user patch infrastructure would sure be nice! It possible to use /etc/portage/bashrc to have this infrastructure. Search mailing list, it was discussed here at least twice, and this is example from solar: http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/portage_misc/bashrc.autopatch There is no need to put such things into ebuild. --=20 Peter. --=-O6nLZOeiVv0JTs0fPbPP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH8LnRz6tlgEWSarMRAs8oAKCQ5w+dP4Fd/0Dmuwxinn49LGCbNACgnx/3 eA5kIZKf9NzwIwoGwozvhuQ= =RUtp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-O6nLZOeiVv0JTs0fPbPP-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list