Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/iproute2: ChangeLog iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild

[Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]


В Пнд, 31/03/2008 в 06:21 +0000, Duncan пишет:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> posted
> 200803302039.14615.vapier@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on  Sun, 30 Mar
> 2008 20:39:14 -0400:
> 
> > there is no package-manager specificness here.  it's already completely
> > doable from a user perspective, just having it in the ebuild makes my
> > life and users' lives easier.  i'm using it in packages that tend to
> > have a lot of extraneous patchsets associated with them.  the random
> > patches were punted from ebuilds and now it's up to the user to maintain
> > the feature sets.

> The point here though is that particularly for the glib patch, which has 
> undergone several rounds of testing and looks set for another round or 
> two at least, this user patch infrastructure would sure be nice!

It possible to use /etc/portage/bashrc to have this infrastructure.
Search mailing list, it was discussed here at least twice, and this is
example from solar:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/portage_misc/bashrc.autopatch

There is no need to put such things into ebuild.

-- 
Peter.

[-- Attachment #2: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]