From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaByW-0006RZ-Fy for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:37:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08500E007A; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF522E007A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1556741nfh.26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z2lG1nnTjxfYnrbh/dPA9mKFNOGaesSoZBP9Hzsv7/k=; b=AZY2Fxu9AQZJ3SGsLeQphowyz+yq3GKfKOMTNR+8b1Yy+dLtToD5tOCnCF7IeV5Nb5r7/5OGG5mePxYISFud7p2HZQktICRggaHrPA/JNCbE5pPnZuGeNG1pkUzLad2L0nZRqEqDJ54vuYdKzvkYbXCoBt4qY83UkT2X3N47j5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y1MAU6mNOnY9crJIPSY/vXbyY9+ooB4hsQ4kI90udza0LH5nAZqgLUl//ZdjZ5yHkj8l1CS0cxMsKQddS3u6I1VhzzNk72GshqzfDEWCRf9wr9Bgwe8hfMlNI5UMs67pFwhu98V3OUujN+2mJgL/H7PmPjrYmQISR2ylf22rGPA= Received: by 10.78.183.8 with SMTP id g8mr31171127huf.39.1205509043417; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.65.211? ( [213.234.126.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z33sm3374486ikz.0.2008.03.14.08.37.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:37:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Help offered - Portage tree From: Natanael Copa To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <47DA40E7.9020100@gentoo.org> References: <430880c50803121635g294f505av259707f7e6a746bb@mail.gmail.com> <1205415290.17945.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> <1205425423.7261.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <47D99234.6030200@gmail.com> <47DA40E7.9020100@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:37:19 +0100 Message-Id: <1205509039.22101.19.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f33aaf90-36b4-468c-b285-3ef472a8cc27 X-Archives-Hash: c30dde9bb2340f6c09b67a50d846310c On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:09 +0100, Jan Kundr=E1t wrote: > Natanael Copa wrote: > > So since I build a distro where size does matter (uclibc) I realised=20 > > that even if I submit bugs for broken RDEPEND, there will never be an= =20 > > end to those bug reports. Looking at this thread, it seems i was righ= t. >=20 > I wonder what you are looking at :(.=20 IIRC thread starter complained about too many wrong RDEPEND. > You've been told by multiple=20 > developers that we do care about dep correctness and are willing to fix= =20 > bugs when we hear about them. Problem is not that devs are not willing to fix. Problem is that its to easy to inject wrong RDEPEND in the tree in the first place and only way to get it out from there is to wait for someone to report it. Since many/most devs dont use binpkgs its expected that errors in RDEPEND are there. Might be i have ideas how to fix but I need to gain some experience with repoman before I present those. -nc --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list