From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JKNBW-0004We-4Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:21:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25E4DE0662; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from workbox.localdomain (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFFEE0662 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:21:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by workbox.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95651A8400C; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:14:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: removal of digest files from the tree From: Chris Gianelloni To: "Santiago M. Mola" Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, pr@gentoo.org, release@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3c32af40801301545r488662ael1db96f49a8acd3ee@mail.gmail.com> References: <479BD99A.8010408@gentoo.org> <20080127013537.GU25497@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <479D2BB7.7090905@gentoo.org> <1201484678.6479.61.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <47A102B6.7090409@gentoo.org> <20080130233237.GF20263@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <3c32af40801301545r488662ael1db96f49a8acd3ee@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:14:48 -0800 Message-Id: <1201738488.21440.125.camel@workbox.quova.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 X-Archives-Salt: 9b15e9bc-75b1-43e5-9aa9-8f66f712893b X-Archives-Hash: f1233a0a2487164f73704eb3c10b0017 On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 00:45 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 12:32 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 12:05:26AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > >> I think throwing up an announcement today/tomorrow for Thursday/Friday > > >> should be sufficient for this sort of a change, as it won't affect any > > >> user who has a version of portage released in the past ~1.5 years. > > > So, since it seems nobody objected it, time for the announcement? And the > > > removal (server-side by robbat2) would be best done right before the > > > snapshot? > > It's pretty much irrelevant to the snapshot. wolf31o2 has my patch to > > exclude digests in the snapshot anyway. > > > > Then I guess it could be done as soon as the doc patch is prepared... It really is best done in the tree first, so everything is correct for the snapshot. We didn't have much issue last time because we push "manifest1_obsolete" into the snapshot, so digests are removed, anyway, but I'd *really* prefer if this were done prior to the snapshot being made. The less fudging I have to do with the snapshot, the better. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Games Developer -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list