From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHwJH-000213-PC for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:15:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFCECE0683; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B069EE0683 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id guxm1Y0030SCNGk0501100; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:15:37 +0000 Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([24.6.168.204]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id gvFc1Y0034Qw7hC3V00000; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:15:37 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=B9rGynF6X8AA:10 a=Im5w2Ui49TvyQgeGVV4A:9 a=X1Su9opzc8Vc_Roe0eVXYpDyr0gA:4 a=WeOa-AV5lc8A:10 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=VUBUfS2KiIqwLUg0-W4A:9 a=3vmS1OlvVdUNqOMYavG1WLT7wJQA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C3317B99DD for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:15:52 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjqnN7XhcSAl for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:15:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.50] (inertia.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.50]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1900E17B803B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:15:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Concerns about WIPE_TMP change [offtopic] From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <81bfc67a0801211734w65992bc6n710fe3937fddb97e@mail.gmail.com> References: <479156FF.5030508@xs4all.nl> <20080119021236.GO10389@aerie.halcy0n.com> <4791F359.1050500@gentoo.org> <47928523.2080203@xs4all.nl> <47934FEA.3080603@gentoo.org> <81bfc67a0801211734w65992bc6n710fe3937fddb97e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ulLsh2TBdo0nkC27KFWV" Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:06:16 -0800 Message-Id: <1201158376.16731.9.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 X-Archives-Salt: 84b77af5-3663-447b-b2db-41f60cc5edcd X-Archives-Hash: 05ee4c5ab95b4a01d810677256575cc6 --=-ulLsh2TBdo0nkC27KFWV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 20:34 -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > On Jan 20, 2008 8:43 AM, Richard Freeman wrote: > Stefan de Konink wrote: > > ..very offtopic but how are you all compiling stuff like > firefox on a > > ram disk. Or is 8GB of ram very cheap suddenly? >=20 > not to mention, last time I checked open office only required ~2GB of > space to compile and it takes more than firefox. Most apps can be done > in less than 512MB The largest abuser of space in the tree that I am aware of is games-fps/ut2004-data which weighs in at nearly 7GB to install. I'm pretty sure that games-strategy/nwn-data is pretty close with USE=3D"hou sou" enabled. ;] --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Games Developer --=-ulLsh2TBdo0nkC27KFWV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkeYOOgACgkQkT4lNIS36YF1eQCfXSCHxoAqtKsfKuYnVKcwvrWQ 00MAoLoLCMXDkGIkYZB2l3o8TZCS+NBo =X2HX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ulLsh2TBdo0nkC27KFWV-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list