From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-28885-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JE7mv-0004YF-IZ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:42:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3D64E0976;
	Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FE1E0976
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (graaff.xs4all.nl [80.100.185.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7001F6558C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Projects and subproject status
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <47829A4A.5000905@gentoo.org>
References: <47829A4A.5000905@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-K0iSxgO8f5m0aC25vEwU"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:42:22 +0100
Message-Id: <1200249742.5577.18.camel@ip6-localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 
X-Archives-Salt: 6fe2ffc1-9d56-4145-a6ef-7371bd37854a
X-Archives-Hash: f6b418046a118dcc2079005dcbc15893


--=-K0iSxgO8f5m0aC25vEwU
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 22:31 +0100, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Are we fine?

Speaking for the ruby herd (which isn't a project and doesn't have a
lead, but I'm sure Richard or Josh will correct any mistakes I make):

No. Even though there are plenty of people in the herd only a few of us
commit on a regular basis. We could use more people helping out with
ruby stuff, especially now that ruby 1.9 has been released. At the
moment our bug list is only growing, and we don't have much time to
pro-actively bump any of the packages.

On the bright side we've identified and partly fixed a number of eclass
issues, and things are shaping up in that department.

Future plans:
- get ruby 1.9 into the tree and allow for it work in parallel with ruby
1.8.
- rework the gems eclass so that we can actually test and patch gems
without grossly abusing ebuild conventions.
- create a ruby project to make coordination a bit easier and have a
specific place for in-progress stuff and general knowledge on ruby in
Gentoo.
- recruit some more people to help out with ruby.

Kind regards,

Hans

--=-K0iSxgO8f5m0aC25vEwU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHiluOQUozDL2JlH4RAgMDAJ9MSnk/W/PcRjFwIGFcL7OboEL7aACdF1MX
SnHY/9P4B8Oluxdn4xJGm9o=
=4Jn6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-K0iSxgO8f5m0aC25vEwU--

-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list