From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCh12-0007HN-Eo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:55:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B173E0748; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181BEE0748 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA6D17B99DE for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQuKw2iH4RE2 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.31] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5C17B99DB for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 19:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <50574.192.168.2.159.1199888711.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080109121309.GA14454@ferdyx.org> <50574.192.168.2.159.1199888711.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mY419MtBWC6D+puG6dFj" Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:54:47 -0800 Message-Id: <1199908487.8082.24.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Archives-Salt: 4c8e4ce8-02fc-47fe-a372-69f1a772ae6c X-Archives-Hash: d96859b7d11697c80a6973a999aa7461 --=-mY419MtBWC6D+puG6dFj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 09:25 -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote: > I never even mentioned any specific arch in my original request, nor > did I call any developer out. So please, nobody needs to take this > personally. Correct, you did not. What I find absolutely *damning* is the fact that as soon as any arches *were* mentioned, everybody was talking about the same one. It's rather funny that everybody seems to have the exact same impression of what architecture might be a slacker and would be affected by this. I wonder why that is? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer --=-mY419MtBWC6D+puG6dFj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHhSaHkT4lNIS36YERAsQXAKC7chUuLC8LmaPH+NMfgIQvJq54NQCgmRrL APtFcIm1/KpagmXuH0Fkeu4= =Lj6f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mY419MtBWC6D+puG6dFj-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list