From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBPWQ-00016y-Pn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 07:02:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF783E009D; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 07:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F73FE009D for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 07:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Jan 2008 04:15:31 -0000 Received: from chello080108115144.1.11.univie.teleweb.at (EHLO [192.168.0.64]) [80.108.115.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 06 Jan 2008 05:15:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #28563408 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+qPxtGXpWq4y+c4DMVXw+SVDNI64IXAbrb9oE9xm 0Q1B4DIMlhGEKZ Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January From: Matthias Langer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1199574394.15952.14.camel@localhost> References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> <20080104012750.63f4f23a@snowcone> <63044.68.54.223.178.1199445791.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080104210213.50a99e6b@snowcone> <1199506450.7609.23.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <477FBC0E.2090906@gentoo.org> <1199574394.15952.14.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ukl4Z5lqC0WtNjvnTCdr" Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:15:24 +0100 Message-Id: <1199592924.14970.34.camel@vega.lnet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: a36a8c71-ac86-4ec9-8f60-4ebb8aa473df X-Archives-Hash: 57a16442f0df8e994f32a5d50be379dc --=-ukl4Z5lqC0WtNjvnTCdr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 02:06 +0300, Peter Volkov wrote: > =D0=92 =D0=A1=D0=B1=D1=82, 05/01/2008 =D0=B2 18:19 +0100, Luca Barbato = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > Anything other suggestions? >=20 > I think, arch which does not manage to cope with stabilize bugs force > users to use unstable branch so it's good both for developers and users > to force such arch to concentrate on fixing real bugs and maintain only > unstable branch. Decision to drop stable branch for certain arch should > be done by council after request and discussion on -dev having > arch@gentoo.org in CC. >=20 Well, if running mips actually causes more breakage than running ~mips and if it is unlikely that this will change soon, then the stable keyword is not just useless, but misleading. In this case, just dropping it seems the most sensible solution. Thus it all comes down to a question for mips users/developers: Is mips any longer more stable than ~mips? Any opinions? =20 --=-ukl4Z5lqC0WtNjvnTCdr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHgFXc7MvyVd+UcwMRAsM0AJ9uXRd0BKml42I3JNXbBFd3MHi/kQCfbEg6 1iTGkv/F+VyOTAyhAAjbjWU= =Yf7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ukl4Z5lqC0WtNjvnTCdr-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list