From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMlo-00020U-3z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:53:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m039qMbh011388; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:52:22 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m039nY1j007424 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:49:34 GMT Received: from [10.73.1.31] (uberlaptop.marples.name [10.73.1.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BF21900DE for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:49:34 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC available for testing. From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20080102203817.39a258d7@gmail.com> References: <1199191260.2786.9.camel@uberpc.marples.name> <20080102203817.39a258d7@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:49:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1199353773.1574.14.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a56e893f-e0c9-45b0-b4cc-32db9b33f1d0 X-Archives-Hash: ab9e9571e502d69dd438aef95c2a956c On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 20:38 -0800, Nathan Smith wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:41:00 +0000 > Roy Marples wrote: > > > Hi List > > > > 2008 is here and it's time for some change! > > > > OpenRC is now ready for testing. There are no ebuilds in the tree, but > > some are available here [1] that offers a baselayout-2 shell that > > pulls in openrc-9999. I'll just offer a git ebuild for the time > > being, so bugs can be fixed fast without having to bump all the time. > > But it should be fairly smooth going. > > I am wondering about the blocker on baselayout < 2.0 in your git > overlay ebuild for baselayout-2. Is there some reason that the upgrade > path from baselayout-1 to -2 will not work for openrc? File ownership of a few things changed from baselayout -> openrc. Enough so that openrc is a self enclosed product, but relies on system files that baselayout supplies. A blocker is the only way I know of doing this so portage doesn't complain about overwriting files owned by another package. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list