From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iofgv-00061K-DX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:39:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA4DcE5k008782; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 13:38:14 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA4DZis5005494 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 13:35:44 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1259454nfh for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:35:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:sender; bh=bwtC7KNCmz5V9XjHdxOmE94/P9Sbs9D5Jvir/ptSyAw=; b=PyWrlUD3AEEVJ+wQJYZ3b7FBNwKVhNPdldHuGFDKSTqrCH0vten8URAFEi43HkAUOpItTyHfsB2lSTfkNPS0zBPO29OF6S88SZTGs83NpJRrS91p5frOF3T324DITi4okWyK4PPZmU4JdyjyadQ75X+Z0vQGaQ4sxg3blrPno44= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:sender; b=lV41H8pmK+PwYX3JClRtRBKTK711wEKw0URXu7fpgtZXK4tE4QcQGPLw1UVR/E2DVjyaiYBNlasLo4a0Knk/LaHd+0g5F1/nHgjC/bT+qkX2Q5g1GAocWWjCZKNZXAwMp4NTWlKa+Fwb22ysfHb6TgS5PQc5H+wFesnTN6dF7sk= Received: by 10.86.1.1 with SMTP id 1mr2565311fga.1194183344016; Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [77.246.104.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d13sm9846172fka.2007.11.04.05.35.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 04 Nov 2007 05:35:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libpcap: ChangeLog libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild libpcap-0.9.4.ebuild From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Donnie Berkholz In-Reply-To: <20071009194009.GC962@supernova> References: <20071009194009.GC962@supernova> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hD9IseGIErPrg9/R7+vw" Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:33:54 +0300 Message-Id: <1194183234.22658.19.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Sender: Peter Volkov X-Archives-Salt: df0f2f4f-f12d-4507-bb9d-ff0d82d043e5 X-Archives-Hash: a54bc01df292187d41dce9dad3a86918 --=-hD9IseGIErPrg9/R7+vw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =D0=92 =D0=92=D1=82=D1=80, 09/10/2007 =D0=B2 12:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz = =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On 17:57 Tue 09 Oct , Markus Ullmann (jokey) wrote: > > 1.1 net-libs/libpcap/libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild > >=20 > > DEPEND=3D"!virtual/libpcap" > > PROVIDE=3D"virtual/libpcap" >=20 > Does this still work properly with some of the new portage versions that=20 > consider installed packages? Seems to work here. Are there any know problems with this approach? --=20 Peter. --=-hD9IseGIErPrg9/R7+vw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=AD=D1=82=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=87=D0=B0=D1=81=D1=82=D1=8C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=81=D0=BE=D0=BE=D0=B1=D1=89=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D1=86=D0=B8=D1=84=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B9?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=8C=D1=8E?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHLcpCz6tlgEWSarMRAoSKAJ9+ZGKPUxMeW6D+S2cZKvXmydrRrgCfXZCH 8NjpBfsjxNWjIcR5exoQKWc= =b+uJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hD9IseGIErPrg9/R7+vw-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list