From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhM7j-0000kI-AV for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:20:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9F99T9a025239; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:09:29 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9F97e0d022999 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 09:07:41 GMT Received: from [10.73.1.31] (uberlaptop.marples.name [10.73.1.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E94190038 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:07:40 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-misc/note: ChangeLog note-1.3.3.ebuild From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20071015084353.GF30883@gentoo.org> References: <20071015074250.GG23990@supernova> <200710150956.05673.bo.andresen@zlin.dk> <1192437335.1277.1.camel@uberlaptop.development.ltl> <20071015084353.GF30883@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:07:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1192439259.1277.9.camel@uberlaptop.development.ltl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: e3e21308-db38-4f5b-9c39-ef87376714d5 X-Archives-Hash: f37ca71f9bc56b420316400830606351 On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 10:43 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 15-10-2007 09:35:35 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > find "${D}" -type f -name *${v}.*pm -delete > > Looks like you rely on your shell here to assume that you meant > "*${v}.*pm" because there is nothing that matches that pattern by > coincidence. If it does, your find probably doesn't do what you expect > it to. It was like that in the original code snippet, I assumed that is what the author intended? Anyway, you're probably right. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list