From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IeoXE-0002AL-TT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:04:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l988rx3U023001; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:53:59 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l988oLsF016876 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:50:22 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so796767ugf for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D8RpPu8BjOrWy/6Kkol3kUYfcUvSf+rpq5tzmbEe/lM=; b=pve3xeESurkScAPskV4muLXWzQEU13RAhOw7Ud0Iqijre5MKIOwEGDrgl7OwZCpcid5Gsf4ryL54Ws0UY0TUBTI085b1mNGCLIRW2p1Nm9068Fv60tWgK7yt+M4qC3Wmfa6rITE9jyGCmWnT6i66WFxMI3gHk0FtAes8dPmIXLs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=hscbMyU9f8DWj+RbATihxlnevbz8h2mGD6Ud97x/NbDrjwkD+R7MFZgQeZz4YCdf4FdHe/EjN9/ftnUlsz0k/2MNsagHfWdYU6Q1kGGAAk4Ag70hT6xquCy7hCpQJjY5ui0BEiPLEZffkacLxI8McqqLShVNApcAvQ2V6mfIH28= Received: by 10.67.116.4 with SMTP id t4mr6589010ugm.1191833420437; Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.65.211? ( [213.234.126.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z34sm7068751ikz.2007.10.08.01.50.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 08 Oct 2007 01:50:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [gentoo-dev] GNU userland and binary package (WAS: RFC: sh versionator.eclass) From: Natanael Copa To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4709A35B.6070407@gentoo.org> References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <4709071F.6010900@gentoo.org> <20071007221505.GJ2848@gentoo.org> <200710072151.03442.vapier@gentoo.org> <4709A35B.6070407@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:50:15 +0200 Message-Id: <1191833415.31670.41.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c61d111b-8935-4d7a-a5a4-37e12b8f1e7f X-Archives-Hash: f2a127fc87190c2237c02c2114af9e54 On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your userland > > is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild > > writers. you want a deficient runtime environment, more power to you, but > > forcing that environment onto ebuild developers is not acceptable. off the > > top of my head, i'd like to see GNU find/xargs added to the ebuild > > environment. > > -mike > > Mike, exactly as I said. That's option #2, and I think it could be a > great solution. As for deficient, well, that's in the eye of the > beholder. ;) > > -Joe Question, if you go for #2. Does that mean you will need all the required GNU userland to do binary only installs? It would be highly desireable to be able to do binary installs (write your own binary only package manager) without depending on all the GNU stuff needed to compile the packages. -nc -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list