From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-26945-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1IeaBg-0000u3-MI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:45:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l97HYA0w009981; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:34:10 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l97HVZAP006617 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 17:31:36 GMT Received: from [10.73.1.30] (uberpc.marples.name [10.73.1.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FA9190038 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 7 Oct 2007 18:21:19 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass From: Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200710070109.18838.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <1191335103.2189.22.camel@uberlaptop.development.ltl> <200710021830.26584.george@gentoo.org> <200710070109.18838.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Organization: Gentoo Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:31:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1191778261.2499.0.camel@uberpc.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l97HYA2f009981 X-Archives-Salt: 5c6f20d2-64dc-493b-bd5d-0a14f11a9edb X-Archives-Hash: 7dee4b779347899bb9df95e81a8e1962 On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 01:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 02 October 2007, George Shapovalov wrote: > > Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples =D0=92=D0=B8 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF= =D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8: > > > And here it is > > > > - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" =3D "gfortran" ]]; then > > + if [ "${FORTRANC}" =3D "gfortran" ]; then > > > > You know, it is funny to see these lines after all those cries about = how [ > > is evil and we should really never ever use it but rather always use = [[ > > form :). > > > > Oh, btw, does the compliant sh correctly process the most cited > > composition? : [ -n $foo ] && [ -z $foo ] && echo "huh?" > > (straight from devmanual, the primary reason why [ is considered bad= ) >=20 > [...] will crap a brick if foo expands to multiple arguments Only if unquoted. > which is why=20 > [[...]] is preferred ... it'll do the sane thing and work correctly=20 Which encourages developers not to quote in my view. Roy --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list