From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IdtsZ-0005x3-9X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:34:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l95KOMvJ005234; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:24:22 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l95KMTHO002963 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:22:30 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9148B4006 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:22:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U4awi6elvGeV for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.100.25] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687CF8B4002 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new-style virtual/editor From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1191610633.13943.49.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> References: <20071005204242.641b8727@gentoo.org> <20071005184629.GN29572@supernova> <1191610633.13943.49.camel@TesterTop3.tester.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DuMjp9wFIn0sQFCXu0Ko" Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:22:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1191615728.8800.16.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 X-Archives-Salt: 2f1f8575-1a41-4ab3-8251-e16d5d2b4900 X-Archives-Hash: 9119f5e31256d9caec68703f9565d7f0 --=-DuMjp9wFIn0sQFCXu0Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 14:57 -0400, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at=20 > > all? >=20 > !rdep virtual/editor > virtual/editor <- app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron >=20 > I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just > removing virtual/editor. Ehh... "system" also requires it. Removing the virtual means everybody, no matter what, will get nano and won't be able to remove it without portage bitching up a storm. Currently, you can replace nano with any editor that meets the virtual and it'll satisfy the system target. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-DuMjp9wFIn0sQFCXu0Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHBpzwkT4lNIS36YERAsg1AKC9waEj+W6wS6Fdcoye78X4B35aVQCgnhqw rnxUHifiYUNA5dOnnH7qrlo= =l9az -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DuMjp9wFIn0sQFCXu0Ko-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list