From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31433 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Jul 2003 13:21:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28255 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2003 13:21:24 -0000 Message-ID: <1191.192.168.0.90.1058275226.squirrel@192.168.0.150> In-Reply-To: <20030714231534.C12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> References: <20030714214621.33b75fbd.zhen@gentoo.org> <20030714220238.B12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> <20030714230801.6688ba3f.zhen@gentoo.org> <20030714231534.C12388@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:20:26 -0500 (CDT) From: cal@calevans.com To: "splite" Cc: "John Davis" ,gentoo-core@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. X-Archives-Salt: 7c38e8da-0457-4ec4-926b-d536ab243d3e X-Archives-Hash: 9b8067f7dbcc0457c7cdeb9d77d115a8 splite said: > And here I thought I was being proactive. Or should I wait until the > first > Gentoo Continental Congress and submit my concerns as a rider to an > appropriations bill? Shoot, I'm satirising again, aren't I? > And the crowd stands and cheers! Seriously John, you made some well thought out, eloquent but in-appropriate suggestions. Yes, we need organization but not the top heavy beast you are proposing. I have carefully read the new structure that is being implements and it seems to me to be the bare minimum necessary to keep the project moving. And IMHO that should be the measure of any government's size. =C= p.s. splite. All good bulleted lists have 3 points, not 2! :) * * Cal Evans * http://www.christianperformer.com * Stay plugged in to your audience! * -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list