[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Donnie Berkholz]

On 17:26 Mon 24 Sep     , Jurek Bartuszek (jurek) wrote:
> jurek       07/09/24 17:26:38
> 
>   Modified:             ChangeLog
>   Added:                libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild
>   Log:
>   dev-dotnet/libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1: Fix linking against image libraries (bug #192068)
>   (Portage version: 2.1.3.9)

> 	cd ${S}
> 
> 	epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-1.1.13-libungif-configure-fix.diff
> 	epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-imglibs.patch

Needs quotes for S and FILESDIR.

> src_compile() {
> 	if [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -gt "3" ]] || \
> 	   ( [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -eq "3" ]] && [[ "$(gcc-minor-version)" -gt "3" ]] )

Code block { } might be good here instead of a subshell, or perhaps it 
could use logic that's less convoluted such as if..then. Also don't need 
the double quotes.

> 	if use ppc ; then
> 		sed -i -e 's:-Werror::g' src/Makefile
> 	fi

We should never leave -Werror in -- make this unconditional. It tends to 
cause large quantities of packages to break every time there's a 
compiler upgrade.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Bo Ørsted Andresen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]

On Monday 24 September 2007 21:56:49 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > 	if [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -gt "3" ]] || \
> > 	   ( [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -eq "3" ]] && [[ "$(gcc-minor-version)" -gt "3" ]] )
>
> Code block { } might be good here instead of a subshell, or perhaps it
> could use logic that's less convoluted such as if..then. Also don't need
> the double quotes.

Or it could be as simple as:

if [[ $(gcc-major-version) -gt 3 || \
    ( $(gcc-major-version) -eq 3 && $(gcc-minor-version) -gt 3 ) ]]

[[ allows grouping of conditions without spawning subshells.

-- 
Bo Andresen

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Steve Long]

Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:

> On Monday 24 September 2007 21:56:49 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> > if [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -gt "3" ]] || \
>> > ( [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -eq "3" ]] && [[ "$(gcc-minor-version)" -gt
>> > "3" ]] )
>>
>> Code block { } might be good here instead of a subshell, or perhaps it
>> could use logic that's less convoluted such as if..then. Also don't need
>> the double quotes.
> 
> Or it could be as simple as:
> 
> if [[ $(gcc-major-version) -gt 3 || \
>     ( $(gcc-major-version) -eq 3 && $(gcc-minor-version) -gt 3 ) ]]
> 
> [[ allows grouping of conditions without spawning subshells.
> 
http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ#faq31 explains the differences between [[
and [, although in this case I'd use:
if ((gcc-major-version>3 || (gcc-major-version==3 && gcc-minor-version>3) ))

"As a rule of thumb, [[ is used for strings and files. If you want to
compare numbers, use an ArithmeticExpression."


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Steve Long]

Steve Long wrote:

> Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> 
>> On Monday 24 September 2007 21:56:49 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> > if [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -gt "3" ]] || \
>>> > ( [[ "$(gcc-major-version)" -eq "3" ]] && [[ "$(gcc-minor-version)"
>>> > -gt "3" ]] )
>>>
>>> Code block { } might be good here instead of a subshell, or perhaps it
>>> could use logic that's less convoluted such as if..then. Also don't need
>>> the double quotes.
>> 
>> Or it could be as simple as:
>> 
>> if [[ $(gcc-major-version) -gt 3 || \
>>     ( $(gcc-major-version) -eq 3 && $(gcc-minor-version) -gt 3 ) ]]
>> 
>> [[ allows grouping of conditions without spawning subshells.
>> 
> http://wooledge.org/mywiki/BashFAQ#faq31 explains the differences between
> [[ and [, although in this case I'd use:
> if ((gcc-major-version>3 || (gcc-major-version==3 && gcc-minor-version>3)
> ))
> 
> "As a rule of thumb, [[ is used for strings and files. If you want to
> compare numbers, use an ArithmeticExpression."
> 
> 
Er missed that it's a function call (thanks zlin) but the general point
applies (and tbh I wouldn't call the function twice in any case, so
Donnie's point re logic might be more cogent.)


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Peter Volkov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 408 bytes --]

В Пнд, 24/09/2007 в 12:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет:
> > 	if use ppc ; then
> > 		sed -i -e 's:-Werror::g' src/Makefile
> > 	fi
> 
> We should never leave -Werror in -- make this unconditional. 

"never" is too strong: for example, wireshark's upstream told me that
they want code to be built with -Werror. If something breaks they are
interested in report to fix that.

-- 
Peter.

[-- Attachment #2: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1071 bytes --]

On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Пнд, 24/09/2007 в 12:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет:
> > > 	if use ppc ; then
> > > 		sed -i -e 's:-Werror::g' src/Makefile
> > > 	fi
> >
> > We should never leave -Werror in -- make this unconditional.
>
> "never" is too strong: for example, wireshark's upstream told me that
> they want code to be built with -Werror. If something breaks they are
> interested in report to fix that.

not really ... what builds today on $arch with $gcc_version is no guarantee 
it'll work on any other $arch or $gcc_version (and considering the change of 
warnings in gcc, this makes it likely)

-Werror makes sense in development code, but not releases (ever) ... 
forcing -Werror just makes for annoyed users and that flag really should be 
an "opt-in" thing (aka, put it in your CFLAGS)

this is exactly why the werror stuff in binutils has been disabled for pretty 
much ever

then again, while i think it's pretty stupid, i'm not about to go around and 
force people to remove it ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-dotnet/libgdiplus: ChangeLog libgdiplus-1.2.5-r1.ebuild

[Rémi Cardona]

Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Пнд, 24/09/2007 в 12:56 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет:
>>> 	if use ppc ; then
>>> 		sed -i -e 's:-Werror::g' src/Makefile
>>> 	fi
>> We should never leave -Werror in -- make this unconditional. 
> 
> "never" is too strong: for example, wireshark's upstream told me that
> they want code to be built with -Werror. If something breaks they are
> interested in report to fix that.

Gstreamer devs also use this, but only when you check out code from CVS.
They take it out for releases. Imho, it's the best of both worlds.

If you want to see what kind of mess leaving stuff like -Werror can
cause, check out this bug : https://bugs.gentoo.org/193369

Cheers :)

Rémi
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list