From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IG1XT-00013J-B1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:54:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6VNrEgf015444; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:53:14 GMT Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6VNpKrs013133 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:51:20 GMT Received: (qmail 32560 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2007 23:51:20 -0000 Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51) by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2007 23:51:20 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by assp.obsidian-studios.com; 31 Jul 2007 19:51:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.22 stable plans From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <46AFC734.2000702@gentoo.org> References: <46AFC734.2000702@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tVrQEpiBjULCJZWqCEE4" Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:51:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1185925882.16161.3.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Archives-Salt: 4b0ebf46-ef66-4ca8-ada2-336eafae2e7f X-Archives-Hash: 5ac1f4ded6431cfe646c5e7f33b7b551 --=-tVrQEpiBjULCJZWqCEE4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 19:35 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote: > On Thursday I plan to request that the x86 and amd64 arch teams mark the=20 > latest gentoo-sources-2.6.22 revision stable. We have no reported=20 > regressions for this kernel release. I haven't been able to get ati-drivers to compile against a 2.6.22 kernel. Seems to be for similar reasons as http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D181982 error: linux/ioctl32.h: No such file or directory Not sure if bumping the ati-drivers package will address that. But I could see that potentially being a problem for 2.6.22 stabilization. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java --=-tVrQEpiBjULCJZWqCEE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGr8r5PrChP8zZLyYRAkplAJwKYwQnKm9OrEMSBn8dSWoWzdNvjACeNVk9 tycf6k8n/hRv3LhsXFsoqT4= =uQc7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tVrQEpiBjULCJZWqCEE4-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list