From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25613-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IFFwt-0000xf-Hx
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:05:12 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6TL4C3F001316;
	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:04:12 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6TL2IMl031482
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:02:18 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.139] (c-66-30-3-184.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [66.30.3.184])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8964FF6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:02:17 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable
	on x86
From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <f8ip04$jvv$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <f8ig5t$p6v$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <200707291927.18514.philantrop@gentoo.org>  <f8ip04$jvv$1@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl"
Organization: Gentoo Foundation
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:01:58 -0400
Message-Id: <1185742918.5561.2.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 
X-Archives-Salt: 344d550d-c8ce-4b9d-a48b-12981823cf95
X-Archives-Hash: 9d360d88633c81c27d7346c24ca66a40


--=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:15 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
> >> Why did you provocate this breakage?
> >> This is not a good idea, IMHO.
> >=20
> > I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166790
>=20
> That has got to be one of the stupidest bug reports i've ever seen.

Do you think you might add something productive to this thread by
explaining why?  Really, if you're just sharing your opinion like this,
it's not conducive to discussion, and it rather belongs on -project or
your blog.

thanks,

Seemant

--=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQBGrQBGiUTIoXwgiI0RAt65AJUTlBLEcFbeIyzo7cxEWDURo9w3AJoDsooM
pOR/P5t9f9ZN24n+xl42EA==
=cvvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list