From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IFFwt-0000xf-Hx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:05:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6TL4C3F001316; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:04:12 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6TL2IMl031482 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:02:18 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.139] (c-66-30-3-184.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [66.30.3.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8964FF6 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86 From: Seemant Kulleen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200707291927.18514.philantrop@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl" Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:01:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1185742918.5561.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Archives-Salt: 344d550d-c8ce-4b9d-a48b-12981823cf95 X-Archives-Hash: 9d360d88633c81c27d7346c24ca66a40 --=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:15 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > >> Why did you provocate this breakage? > >> This is not a good idea, IMHO. > >=20 > > I think so, too. cf. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166790 >=20 > That has got to be one of the stupidest bug reports i've ever seen. Do you think you might add something productive to this thread by explaining why? Really, if you're just sharing your opinion like this, it's not conducive to discussion, and it rather belongs on -project or your blog. thanks, Seemant --=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBGrQBGiUTIoXwgiI0RAt65AJUTlBLEcFbeIyzo7cxEWDURo9w3AJoDsooM pOR/P5t9f9ZN24n+xl42EA== =cvvj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Bj0AC10+aKEGIuxpwDnl-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list