From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IC0Qf-0007IL-5B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:54:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6KLr6ef023728; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:53:06 GMT Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6KLne4A018770 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:49:40 GMT Received: from TesterServ.TesterNet ([70.83.102.151]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JLH00DICZASWGF0@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:49:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uucp by TesterServ.TesterNet with local-rmail (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IC0M0-0007VE-0a for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:49:40 -0400 Received: by localhost.tester.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF53D4A4036; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:49:14 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:49:14 +0100 From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols In-reply-to: <1184889458.19155.2.camel@localhost> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <1184968154.19155.29.camel@localhost> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mr2+o+eUnTwmTC/n9OVR" References: <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> <1184864002.8459.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <200707191909.10542.arfrever.fta@gmail.com> <20070719200201.7369a07e@snowflake> <20070719160251.20a3803c@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> <1184883729.8459.22.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <1184889458.19155.2.camel@localhost> X-Archives-Salt: d1a91da8-43cc-4614-91a2-27848f8bcab4 X-Archives-Hash: 874907e751587612ae2dac85c48294bd --=-mr2+o+eUnTwmTC/n9OVR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-20-07 at 00:57 +0100, Olivier Cr=C3=AAte wrote: > On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > > > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package. > > > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision? > >=20 > > Well, as someone who spends a lot of time working on/with profiles, I > > say go for it. Since these changes would only affect the one package > > and wouldn't pull in any "strange" dependencies on people, we should > > probably do it as high in the profile structure as possible (base? > > default-linux?) so it hits the most users. > >=20 > > I'd like to hear from net-im, as they're ultimately responsible, but I > > don't really see the harm in doing it, so we probably should as it will > > reduce headaches for our users. >=20 > Talking with my net-im hat, I'd say go for it.. Except for silc and > zephyr (which may or may not work very well) and should probably stay > off. Again with my net-im hat, I've removed the MSN use flag from net-im/pidgin-2.0.2 (the latest version). The other protocols are rarely used and have nasty dependencies and will stay as use flags. I consider this discussion closed. --=20 Olivier Cr=C3=AAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-mr2+o+eUnTwmTC/n9OVR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGoS3aHTiOWk7ZorsRAt+FAJ0ZXVXiICmxzsZ+ySwtASoUpqmOtwCfbb7K dxUuqll42w9maVLWLJoDmqY= =YHRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mr2+o+eUnTwmTC/n9OVR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list