Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols

["Olivier Crête" <tester@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --]

On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package.
> > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision?
> 
> Well, as someone who spends a lot of time working on/with profiles, I
> say go for it.  Since these changes would only affect the one package
> and wouldn't pull in any "strange" dependencies on people, we should
> probably do it as high in the profile structure as possible (base?
> default-linux?) so it hits the most users.
> 
> I'd like to hear from net-im, as they're ultimately responsible, but I
> don't really see the harm in doing it, so we probably should as it will
> reduce headaches for our users.

Talking with my net-im hat, I'd say go for it.. Except for silc and
zephyr (which may or may not work very well) and should probably stay
off.

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]