From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBeVA-0003Rt-Ad for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:29:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JMREZh019631; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:27:14 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6JMNHkc012910 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 22:23:17 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA482482F0 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:11:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTlnV4HO90tC for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.28] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CB4248079 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] net-im/pidgin protocols From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070719160251.20a3803c@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> References: <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> <1184864002.8459.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <200707191909.10542.arfrever.fta@gmail.com> <20070719200201.7369a07e@snowflake> <20070719160251.20a3803c@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-KUQkwv0ex82IT5ZP8MT7" Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:22:09 -0700 Message-Id: <1184883729.8459.22.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Archives-Salt: c21dbf11-fbd6-4239-8028-89b4f31a2b98 X-Archives-Hash: e7bb7f3982e1fc47e161702a0b822f77 --=-KUQkwv0ex82IT5ZP8MT7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package. > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision? Well, as someone who spends a lot of time working on/with profiles, I say go for it. Since these changes would only affect the one package and wouldn't pull in any "strange" dependencies on people, we should probably do it as high in the profile structure as possible (base? default-linux?) so it hits the most users. I'd like to hear from net-im, as they're ultimately responsible, but I don't really see the harm in doing it, so we probably should as it will reduce headaches for our users. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-KUQkwv0ex82IT5ZP8MT7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGn+QRkT4lNIS36YERAh2fAJ99BOibKkzqEKaDXI37y+d22qcNFACfXyBG Kkp53Wbq1Yww+4rAKjz0Mz0= =hIvs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KUQkwv0ex82IT5ZP8MT7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list