From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25339-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IBdN7-00061p-3T
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:17:17 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JLGGe2020819;
	Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:16:16 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6JLELoA018536
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:14:21 GMT
Received: from [169.14.245.168] (host34.155.212.242.conversent.net [155.212.242.34])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D986545F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Improving developer/user communication (was
	Re: net-im/pidgin protocols)
From: Seemant Kulleen <seemant@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20070719215933.014b21cd@snowflake>
References: <b21328ed0707182131o722bd625o6c8119a4b084c57f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <469F1C56.6070600@gentoo.org> <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org>
	 <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> <46A0DE7B.6030009@gentoo.org>
	 <469F9271.9080908@gentoo.org> <f7oeb9$9di$1@sea.gmane.org>
	 <469FC366.8020304@gmail.com> <20070719212506.09a52e94@snowflake>
	 <469FCD7A.1090506@bellsouth.net>  <20070719215933.014b21cd@snowflake>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM"
Organization: Gentoo Foundation
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:13:50 -0400
Message-Id: <1184879630.6537.9.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 
X-Archives-Salt: 5eaae313-9735-4098-973f-5109f0817ead
X-Archives-Hash: 32808d2373e1ac9f1b084f64134cd4be


--=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> The set of people who respond is
> heavily skewed towards better-informed users who have time to seek out
> and participate in that kind of questioning.

Fair point, but the more better-informed users we have, the better it is
for everyone in general.


> I want guaranteed total stability, instantly available updates,
> guaranteed backwards compatibility, the ability to install any package
> from source using my configuration of choice in under fifteen seconds
> and a herd of nubile bisexual redheads. Can Gentoo deliver that?

We can do 4 out of 6, haven't you seen the commit logs?

--=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGn9QOiUTIoXwgiI0RAtKEAJ0dzHHNeZaXYvL9J/SQIvImMPlv3gCgj4Jt
ni7+Q0jzIlzEMtFojgA/rHA=
=4kDA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list