From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBdN7-00061p-3T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:17:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6JLGGe2020819; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:16:16 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6JLELoA018536 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:14:21 GMT Received: from [169.14.245.168] (host34.155.212.242.conversent.net [155.212.242.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D986545F for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 21:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving developer/user communication (was Re: net-im/pidgin protocols) From: Seemant Kulleen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070719215933.014b21cd@snowflake> References: <469F1C56.6070600@gentoo.org> <469F372A.9060107@gentoo.org> <469F3A9F.7030004@gentoo.org> <46A0DE7B.6030009@gentoo.org> <469F9271.9080908@gentoo.org> <469FC366.8020304@gmail.com> <20070719212506.09a52e94@snowflake> <469FCD7A.1090506@bellsouth.net> <20070719215933.014b21cd@snowflake> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM" Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:13:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1184879630.6537.9.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Archives-Salt: 5eaae313-9735-4098-973f-5109f0817ead X-Archives-Hash: 32808d2373e1ac9f1b084f64134cd4be --=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 21:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > The set of people who respond is > heavily skewed towards better-informed users who have time to seek out > and participate in that kind of questioning. Fair point, but the more better-informed users we have, the better it is for everyone in general. > I want guaranteed total stability, instantly available updates, > guaranteed backwards compatibility, the ability to install any package > from source using my configuration of choice in under fifteen seconds > and a herd of nubile bisexual redheads. Can Gentoo deliver that? We can do 4 out of 6, haven't you seen the commit logs? --=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGn9QOiUTIoXwgiI0RAtKEAJ0dzHHNeZaXYvL9J/SQIvImMPlv3gCgj4Jt ni7+Q0jzIlzEMtFojgA/rHA= =4kDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9GUj9EeMDc1XN7vLIlHM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list