From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAt2O-0006vZ-Nl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:48:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6HJkdE1016675; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:39 GMT Received: from mail.marples.name (rsm.demon.co.uk [80.177.111.50]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6HJhpqw013136 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:43:51 GMT Received: from [IPv6:fee1::f20b:aaff:fe00:2] (uberpc.marples.name [IPv6:fee1::f20b:aaff:fe00:2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.marples.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838AC190038 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:43:50 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting -project started From: Roy Marples To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <469CFCA8.10608@gentoo.org> References: <469C6A17.8010201@gentoo.org> <20070717110029.21dd8a5e@snowflake> <1184667999.7301.8.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> <469CC061.1090805@gmail.com> <469CC922.1050702@gentoo.org> <469CFCA8.10608@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:43:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1184701425.25419.5.camel@uberpc.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 768aff94-654b-4da7-bfda-2a0695dead8b X-Archives-Hash: e9f738f3d7e233a799c01c284f394437 On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 11:30 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: > Seems to me that new dev announcements should be on [perhaps the > announcement variant] of -dev, since they are related to the development > team. It'd be nice to hear those announcements on the list devs are > required to subscribe to, so all devs hear about new arrivals. As an > IMHO, -dev (or variants) should be for topics of importance to > *developers & development* (but not attacks/flame wars, politics, etc., > obviously), and not strictly limited to *technical/coding* issues, which > seems a bit narrow. Making it narrow should enforce people to stay on topic. Topics of important to the Development Of Gentoo are more valid on council, or trustees mailing lists. Recent example of this is the discussion on licensing which fits in with your description of developers and development. We assign copyright to the Gentoo Foundation so the correct place for discussion is the trustees list. Thanks Roy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list