[gentoo-dev] For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[gentoo-dev] For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 243 bytes --]

:0
* ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
* ^Subject:.*ML changes
/dev/null

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Steve Long]

Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> :0
> * ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
> * ^Subject:.*ML changes
> /dev/null
> 
Sorry was there some reason the rest of us had to read this? If so, please
explain it like a responsible Council member. Or is this your swansong? If
so it's l4m3.



-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Ryan Hill]

Steve Long wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
>> :0
>> * ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
>> * ^Subject:.*ML changes
>> /dev/null
>>
> Sorry was there some reason the rest of us had to read this? If so, please
> explain it like a responsible Council member. Or is this your swansong? If
> so it's l4m3.

Please stop blatantly trolling.  It will not be tolerated on this list.

-- 
dirtyepic                 salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed
 gentoo org          it could suck an ancient virus from the sea
  9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3  5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8)

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Steve Long]

Ryan Hill wrote:

> Steve Long wrote:
>> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> 
>>> :0
>>> * ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
>>> * ^Subject:.*ML changes
>>> /dev/null
>>>
>> Sorry was there some reason the rest of us had to read this? If so,
>> please explain it like a responsible Council member. Or is this your
>> swansong? If so it's l4m3.
> 
> Please stop blatantly trolling.  It will not be tolerated on this list.
> 
Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
to death or anything, is it?

And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[George Prowse]

Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
> 
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
> 
> 
Mate, chill out. We've all had our say and everyone is keeping quiet. 
Methinks that is the best idea now for everyone involved in this 
subject. Capiche?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[George Prowse]

Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
> 
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
> 
> 
Mate, chill out. We've all had our say and everyone is keeping quiet. 
Methinks that is the best idea now for everyone involved in this 
subject. Capiche?
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Vlastimil Babka]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Long wrote:
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.

Why would anyone do that? His trolling is sophisticated, but you're just
an annoying spammer.
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGnC4+tbrAj05h3oQRAogfAJsHwaCR8rOhveFWrmODgKheBHPTyQCgjx1G
uhvlN37SxRrUWS9MaRoIMis=
=s82z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] alternative solution for 'procmail-impaired' folks

[Jakub Moc]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1450 bytes --]

Vlastimil Babka napsal(a):
> Steve Long wrote:
>> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.
> 
> Why would anyone do that? His trolling is sophisticated, but you're just
> an annoying spammer.

Can we please stop this direction? My ZOMG was there to share my
frustration from getting my mailbox flooded by stuff I'm totally not
interested in and which has nothing to do with gentoo *development*.

For less sucky ways of expressing similar feelings as mine, please refer
to http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_131667.xml - sadly, the
picture is gone now :(

To bring this debate back on track - the current council proposal
*fails* to address the real problem: people should not be required to be
subscribed to gentoo-dev (moderated or non-moderated) and important
announcements should be directed to a different (IMO read-only) list.

Why don't we use current gentoo-announce list for seems to exist for
this exact purpose? In that way, people who wish to participate in
on-topic, off-topic or straight retarded debates would still have the
choice to do so, while not forcing the majority of others to 'mark
folder as read' every 6 hours.

TIA.

-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:jakub@gentoo.org
 GPG signature:
 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature   ;)


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Ned Ludd]

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 01:30 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> 
> > :0
> > * ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
> > * ^Subject:.*ML changes
> > /dev/null
> > 
> Sorry was there some reason the rest of us had to read this? If so, please
> explain it like a responsible Council member. Or is this your swansong? If
> so it's l4m3.


Is there some reason you feel fscking compelled to respond to every
single mail on this list. You know it's guys like mostly "just you" that
are driving us away..

-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Samuli Suominen]

On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:30:12 +0100
Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:

> > :0
> > * ^List-Id:.gentoo-dev.gentoo.org.
> > * ^Subject:.*ML changes
> > /dev/null
> Sorry was there some reason the rest of us had to read this? If so,
> please explain it like a responsible Council member. Or is this your
> swansong? If so it's l4m3.

Are you for real?

Still having hard time to believe it.

Poison.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 738 bytes --]

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 02:52 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Perhaps you'd like to explain just how Mr Gianelloni's post was NOT a troll
> then? Or is every developer's procmail setting (particularly for such a
> stupid thread) a matter we should all be discussing? It's not like amne
> never pointed out, several mails ago, that the whole thread had been done
> to death or anything, is it?
> 
> And no, I don't like being lumped in with Mr McCreesh.

How exactly is the technical answer to a technical question (from Jakub,
about how to avoid the thread) a troll?

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]