From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9RNw-0002F5-Ji for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:05:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DK2CpH030560; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:02:12 GMT Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DJx68R024746 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:59:07 GMT Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63529C3A for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:59:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.214]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:59:06 -0400 Received: by web5.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 79FAB21E4C; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:59:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1184356745.9481.1200062183@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: WMF0FgdDDIzmHdV5HoaqJ6uf+XsMO4cbhPY47urdfpcI 1184356745 From: "Thomas Tuttle" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184308886.9892.48.camel@tuxhugs> <1184310715.26227.29.camel@localhost> <20070713095658.39be3d83@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> <4697CA3D.8020604@uchicago.edu> <1184355462.8347.49.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes In-Reply-To: <1184355462.8347.49.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:59:05 -0400 X-Archives-Salt: 0d2c79c1-c02d-4ac1-84f4-34b91131a042 X-Archives-Hash: 4e36de76742a603bda656cf5bdf30282 On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:37:42 -0700, "Chris Gianelloni" said: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 13:53 -0500, Chris Scullard wrote: > > Chris > > Thanks for a level-headed response, Chris. > > I think the biggest source of confusion is that few people went to > actually read the Council stuff from last meeting. Some points of > contention that nobody seems to be getting: > > - Nobody is planning on banning users > - Unmoderated mails will be auto-accepted after some timeout > - Whatever delay is decided can be imposed on developers, too, if they > give reason for it to be enforced on them (read, repeat offenders) > - This includes myself and the other Council members > - All developers will be able to moderate and all moderation is logged > - Developers/users will be able to appeal unfair moderation to devrel, > so action can be taken against people who moderate badly > > That pretty much covers most of the assumptions people are making. Yeah, it covers almost everything I just suggested, except one thing. Users who consistently contribute well, or are arch testers or other relevant "official" contributors, should be able to skip the delay, provided they continue to contribute positively. Thanks, Thomas Tuttle -- Thomas Tuttle - ttuttle@ttuttle.net - http://www.ttuttle.net/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list