From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9OyN-0003iv-5J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:30:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DHTZiD010258; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:29:35 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (c-24-6-168-204.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.168.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DHQRFk006015 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:26:27 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BEE2480E2 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:14:27 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id boZaCFNm-OA0 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.22] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E18D248079 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:13:43 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1184308886.9892.48.camel@tuxhugs> References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184308886.9892.48.camel@tuxhugs> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wFvvgUBvTaCYEJXTQyTA" Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:25:21 -0700 Message-Id: <1184347521.8347.24.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Archives-Salt: a30e5e19-013e-4b2a-a348-e6f7b795ad05 X-Archives-Hash: 1fe67ff4c5cb16a0f7cb016992af5c56 --=-wFvvgUBvTaCYEJXTQyTA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 23:41 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: > Quite frankly, this (if passed) will be Gentoo's deathbed moment, and > this mail will be one of my last from an official Gentoo account. Sure. Just like CoC. Or PMS. Or whatever the popular "Gentoo is dying" topic was prior to that. If you really feel that strongly about it, feel free to leave. Better yet, how about you move to France with the rest of the pussies.. (obligatory South Park quote) Seriously, how about instead of these childish "if this happens, I'm taking my toys and going home" attitudes, you instead try to determine what you can do to improve a situation you see as bad for Gentoo with one you see as positive. I've grown sick of all this talk and would really like to see some action from the peanut gallery. I know this might be too much to ask from the armchair Council, but one can dream, can't they? > For far too long the mailing lists, IRC channels, and other media of > developer communication have been ridden with belligerent, > inconsiderate, and often-accusatory postings. However, instead of > removing the few who cause most (if not all) of this damage to Gentoo, > we are further restricting its development. Actually, I tend to agree with you. The problem is that we really don't have a way to say that "Gentoo, as a project, has decided that we don't want these people" and get rid of them. Rather, we have these policies that tend to protect the guilty and harm the innocent. We've become much too bureaucratic. How about as an outgoing final act for the current Council, we just ban all the asshats from the list (via our own discretion) and we just see how much nicer things are in the month before the next Council has their meeting. I'm willing to bet the new Council wouldn't reverse any of our bans/whatever and we wouldn't need to enact this sort of crap. It would be much easier if we could just be like "hey buddy, you're a dick... we don't want you here" and we got rid of those people. Sure, they'll turn up somewhere else, but do I really give a crap if some guy decides to start flaming on some barely-used list or even outside Gentoo's infrastructure about how much we suck or how unfairly we treated them? We get enough of that crap as it is now, and I don't see it impacting us much, if at all. What *does* impact us severely is the perception that we're not doing anything about our problems. I would much rather do something and be wrong than do nothing. Doing nothing is *guaranteed* to not solve anything. > I, for one, will personally stand against any such action on this list. > If it comes down to it, I will personally approve _any_ non-spam posting > to this list by _anyone_ for the sake of civil disobedience. I encourage > others to take similar action. This type of administration cannot be > allowed to establish itself as proper or "just" in any way. Umm... so you just volunteered to do what we *want* you to do? Good job with that "civil disobedience" there, buddy. :P Can we get some more "civil disobedience" from the rest of you? It will definitely make this project a success and, I think, improve the general attitude on this list. That's right, folks! We need more "civil disobedience" in Gentoo! --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-wFvvgUBvTaCYEJXTQyTA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGl7WBkT4lNIS36YERAga0AJ9DF+766abJTQSNcz/uTCft+6MnuQCdFTqJ P1WYqhJPnQQNokhk1E1Za8E= =1La6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wFvvgUBvTaCYEJXTQyTA-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list