From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9N1m-00082R-Ux for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:25:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DFOqBD031148; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:24:52 GMT Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DFMj68028744 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:22:46 GMT Received: (qmail 27618 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2007 15:22:46 -0000 Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51) by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2007 15:22:46 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by assp.obsidian-studios.com; 13 Jul 2007 11:22:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <469775B1.60605@gentoo.org> References: <20070713133711.5ef6fc6a@zeus.home.xnull.de> <20070713123426.GC30762@hansmi.ch> <469775B1.60605@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pfT1vwDrk6U2GmdLMUAM" Organization: Gentoo Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:22:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1184340167.32429.36.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Archives-Salt: 2da103be-0724-4673-8acc-51099c077c72 X-Archives-Hash: 8c8687c1d811c42a70e83dac0eb7dd82 --=-pfT1vwDrk6U2GmdLMUAM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Michael Hanselmann napsal(a): > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > > > It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the > > maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me. >=20 > Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?! Looking at traffic going both ways I don't think it was meant harshly or etc. More a surprise to the current maintainer. That they weren't contacted to get their feedback on something they are directly responsible for. Before going over their heads or around the bush to get opinions from others. I don't think it was intentionally done. But usually, not sure if it's stated in policy, it's best to try to contact a maintainer first, directly. If one exists, if not the someone maintaining the herd then. Discussing and ideas, thoughts, issues, etc there. Then based on that, elevate the conversation to say -dev ml or etc for all to be involved. I am sure lots of us have lots of ideas about allot of packages. But only a few of us take enough time to commit to being a packages maintainer. Those willing to put their neck on the line should be the first stop, IMHO. Simple misunderstanding miss-communication. :) --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java --=-pfT1vwDrk6U2GmdLMUAM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGl5jFPrChP8zZLyYRAp6WAJoC0Q/N1IVfCYSZc0ipd3oPYD2VbACeKxYy RTwjTxs2d4GGS9hmGlBvsJk= =Xol3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pfT1vwDrk6U2GmdLMUAM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list