From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9Lzg-0007FK-Rw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:19:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6DEHwR5022959; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:17:58 GMT Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6DEE0Kk015883 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:14:00 GMT Received: (qmail 25879 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2007 14:13:59 -0000 Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51) by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2007 14:13:59 -0000 Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by assp.obsidian-studios.com; 13 Jul 2007 10:13:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1184310715.26227.29.camel@localhost> References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184308886.9892.48.camel@tuxhugs> <1184310715.26227.29.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UtfJ4BaXDHN2VQViqtxv" Organization: Gentoo Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:14:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1184336040.32429.6.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 X-Archives-Salt: bf45d21c-5789-4869-a3b1-4f84059f1d9f X-Archives-Hash: de42b7ea84a0083d92ed6b99c9b3f9eb --=-UtfJ4BaXDHN2VQViqtxv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 03:11 -0400, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > Thanks for expressing your point of view that clearly. I stand with > you. Gentoo, for a while, has been taking itself *way* too seriously. > Perhaps that mentality is part of the inevitability of a project's > evolution through its own stages of life.=20 I consider it growing up. Do we want businesses to run and base their service/product offerings on Gentoo? If so we must take it seriously. Otherwise we are just a hobby distro for the uber geeks. What makes a developer only -dev list any different than developers only having a voice on #gentoo-dev? --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java --=-UtfJ4BaXDHN2VQViqtxv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBGl4imPrChP8zZLyYRAv7ZAJoD1lI8SCsvNfcXusl+tlKFwOaALgCVF6m/ VAGkdFEpJ/R8HGbFo1tfZQ== =4IXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UtfJ4BaXDHN2VQViqtxv-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list