From: "Olivier Crête" <tester@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PMS] new dep list (useful just for cross stuff)
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:28:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183555717.26582.2.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707042211.37506.pauldv@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1905 bytes --]
On Wed, 2007-04-07 at 22:11 +1000, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:12:02 Olivier Crête wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-29-06 at 09:30 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > > Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > > > There are various problems that need to be addressed for cross
> > > > development and (especially) multilib/abi. One of the other ones that
> > > > you didn't mention is some kind of subpackage support. For example when
> > > > one installs 32 bit gtk+ to use binary firefox on an 64bit system it
> > > > can share the headers and docs etc. with the 64 bit version. Removing
> > > > either of them must however still preserve those files.
> > >
> > > A quick and dirty way implies that:
> > > - only the "main" abi can install stuff /usr/
> >
> > The secondary need to be able to install into their /usr/${libdir} ..
> > its actually the only place where stuff from the non-main abis should be
> > imho.
>
> If one requires synchronized versions, there should in 99% of the cases not be
> any issue with header files and documentation. It will be equal, so can be
> shared. It might indeed be an option to require the "main" abi to be always
> present.
I really don't see how it can be made to work in a generic wait without
requiring that all sub-arches use the same version as the main arch and
without requiring that the main arch be installed (if we were a binary
distro, we could do a common package and a bunch of sub-packages, but
now we can't).
> Paul
> ps. for include headers it is rather straightforward to make forwarding
> headers with architecture dependent redirects (using the architecture
> defines) in case the headers are not arch independent.
In theory, headers in /usr/include should be arch independant. You if
you at glib, it installs its arch dependant header in /usr/lib
--
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-04 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-06 9:24 [gentoo-dev] [PMS] new dep list (useful just for cross stuff) Luca Barbato
2007-06-06 9:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-06 14:49 ` Luca Barbato
2007-06-29 4:44 ` Paul de Vrieze
2007-06-29 7:30 ` Luca Barbato
2007-06-29 15:12 ` Olivier Crête
2007-07-04 12:11 ` Paul de Vrieze
2007-07-04 13:28 ` Olivier Crête [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1183555717.26582.2.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca \
--to=tester@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox