public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Raudsepp <leio@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Closing bugs on masked packages
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 03:12:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1183335128.26588.6.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f68rcf$fn6$1@sea.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1222 bytes --]

On P, 2007-07-01 at 12:22 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> just a friendly request:  If you do happen to mask a package for
> removal, please do not close any bugs against the package on the basis
> that it's being removed.  There have been several cases where bugs get
> closed WONTFIX or INVALID, the removal is reversed for whatever reason,
> and the bugs fall through the cracks.  Once the package is actually
> deleted, the person removing it should go through bugzie and close any
> open bugs.

I've been operating on the premise that I am the maintainer of the
package in question and marking it as WONTFIX and making it depend on
the removal bug while at it. I don't see what's wrong in that..
If the removal gets reverted, all the depending bugs should be seen and
acted upon. Why should we keep bugs open in our maintainer bugs list if
we are 99% sure the package will get removed? We aren't treecleaners
project, but the maintainers of the packages whose bug we are marking
WONTFIX with the almost certain assumption the package will get removed
soon...


-- 
With Regards,
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: leio@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-02  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-01 18:22 [gentoo-dev] Closing bugs on masked packages Ryan Hill
2007-07-01 18:28 ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-01 18:49   ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-07-01 19:02     ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-01 19:10       ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-07-01 19:12         ` Petteri Räty
2007-07-01 19:27           ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-07-02  0:12 ` Mart Raudsepp [this message]
2007-07-02  1:38   ` Ryan Hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1183335128.26588.6.camel@localhost \
    --to=leio@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox