From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I19LN-0002u1-2G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:12:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KNAnHa028664; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:10:49 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-185-105.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.185.105]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KN8s0b026346 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:08:54 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8CE2480E2 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:57:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P50FQXEG347x for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:56:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.35] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A35C248079 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:56:56 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070620233541.1a3ffa00@snowflake> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201627.27790.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620213546.0352ca85@snowflake> <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> <1182378692.21577.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20070620233541.1a3ffa00@snowflake> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sDBetgyqTuTrj/umMRgj" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:08:33 -0700 Message-Id: <1182380913.21577.20.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 X-Archives-Salt: 6d69e92d-fab7-4363-a12b-c3240b73fd74 X-Archives-Hash: 607feabfdf9dcf56222f7d664d45d243 --=-sDBetgyqTuTrj/umMRgj Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 23:35 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:31:32 -0700 > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases for > > > binary packages? > >=20 > > Ever managed a network of multiple Gentoo identical Gentoo machines? >=20 > That's one use case, yes. Now what are the others? Release building... Backups... Testing newer packages... Oh yeah,and who said we really needed more than one use case? I think providing tools to allow Gentoo to be adopted in the corporate environment is reason enough to have binary package support, and I feel that many people will agree with me. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-sDBetgyqTuTrj/umMRgj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGebNxkT4lNIS36YERAmWsAKCMvDqMP7B64fJ1/NacdP1E1hhZEwCfcbLG tVeD042/rDxOWfIlJPEBpVQ= =NbS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sDBetgyqTuTrj/umMRgj-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list