public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Olivier Crête" <tester@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when	generating	binary packages
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:41:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1182379263.12859.13.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200706201828.00854.vapier@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2181 bytes --]

On Wed, 2007-20-06 at 18:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-20-06 at 17:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > the use of the binpkg is not an issue, it's the creation ... people
> > > blindly creating tbz2's which could contain their sensitive files and
> > > posting them
> > >
> > > i'll just go ahead with the feedback from Olivier and have quickpkg skip
> > > CONFIG_PROTECT by default
> >
> > This will by default create potentially broken packages (since many just
> > wont work without their CONFIG_PROTECTed files). That's why I suggested
> > a big fat warning and accepting that we can't protect users against
> > themselves or against social engineering (aka their own stupidity).
> 
> i think this would only be an issue where quickpkg is being run 
> non-interactively and the output not being reviewed (which i also dont think 
> is a common scenario for quickpkg) ... the new output of quickpkg will be 
> explicit in what it is (or isnt) doing so there wont be any issue of "drive 
> by" social engineering

Well, I often use quickpkg when I want to try a new version of a package
(I quickpkg the currently installed one.. and I want to keep all the
config files). Then I emerge the new one, and I absolutely want to be
able to restore the config files if I want to revert to an older
version, either because they have been broken by the pkg_postinst or
something else. I still haven't heard a good reason to change anything
thats not the printing in quickpkg.

> as for dubbing people who are successfully socially engineered "stupid", i 
> dont really think that's appropriate ... consider noobs on irc in #gentoo who 
> just want to help and havent learned their way around yet.  are they stupid 
> (well they might be, but lets give them the benefit of the doubt) ?  i'd 
> liken the situation to a kid growing up ... kids arent stupid, they lack 
> experience and calling them stupid isnt constructive

I'm not calling anyone stupid... but I'm talking of our inner stupidity
(which we all have)...

-- 
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-20 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-20  4:47 [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 10:45 ` Andrew Gaffney
2007-06-20 10:49 ` Marius Mauch
2007-06-20 11:54   ` [gentoo-dev] VDB Changes (Was Re: how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages) Steve Long
2007-06-20 19:57   ` [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 20:18     ` Petteri Räty
2007-06-20 20:27       ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 20:35         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 20:48           ` Olivier Crête
2007-06-20 20:55             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 20:54           ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 21:01             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 21:19               ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 21:22                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 21:38                   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 21:48                     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 21:59                       ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 22:02                 ` Olivier Crête
2007-06-20 22:28                   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 22:41                     ` Olivier Crête [this message]
2007-06-20 22:50                       ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 23:11                         ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-20 23:44                           ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 22:31               ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-20 22:35                 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 22:49                   ` Luca Barbato
2007-06-20 23:08                   ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-06-20 23:12                     ` Daniel Ostrow
2007-06-20 23:51                       ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-06-20 23:18                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-21  7:57                   ` Tobias Klausmann
2007-06-20 22:58               ` Jan Kundrát
2007-06-20 21:04       ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-06-20 21:11     ` Ned Ludd
2007-06-20 21:38       ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 13:04 ` Olivier Crête
2007-06-20 13:15   ` Matthias Schwarzott
2007-06-20 15:43     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2007-06-20 16:44     ` [gentoo-dev] " Marius Mauch
2007-06-20 20:07   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 20:12     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 20:19       ` Andrew Gaffney
2007-06-20 20:25         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2007-06-20 20:53           ` Andrew Gaffney
2007-06-20 21:09             ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2007-06-21  1:38               ` [gentoo-dev] User warnings (Was Re: how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages) Steve Long
2007-06-21  1:42             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages Steve Long
2007-06-21  0:13           ` [gentoo-dev] " Josh Saddler
2007-06-21  2:24             ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-21  3:04               ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-21  3:18                 ` Josh Saddler
2007-06-21  6:11                 ` Ned Ludd
2007-06-21  6:23                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-21  6:17                 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-06-22  6:24                   ` Mike Frysinger
2007-06-20 20:26       ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1182379263.12859.13.camel@localhost \
    --to=tester@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox