From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I18lU-0004E7-Cb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:35:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5KMXxJo003421; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:33:59 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-185-105.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.185.105]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5KMVsY6001049 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:31:55 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948C92480E2 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:20:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZpj81I2kdup for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:19:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.35] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE2E248079 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:19:55 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> References: <200706200047.04951.vapier@gentoo.org> <200706201627.27790.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620213546.0352ca85@snowflake> <200706201654.35042.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070620220142.629252a4@snowflake> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tzd9PhiR7SkA4qVUjyJ1" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:31:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1182378692.21577.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 X-Archives-Salt: 134bd0f1-06e8-42c6-81d7-fffca6d25caa X-Archives-Hash: 7c41b8587005fef5b09ded0ffaba7e82 --=-tzd9PhiR7SkA4qVUjyJ1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 22:01 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases for > binary packages? Ever managed a network of multiple Gentoo identical Gentoo machines? Compiling the exact same packages with the exact same USE/C(XX)FLAGS/LDFLAGS/etc on multiple machines is an egregious waste of resources, especially in a corporate environment where maintenance windows simply aren't large enough to allow for a multiple-hour compile job to run. Plus, who keeps GCC on their production servers, anyway? ;]=20 --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-tzd9PhiR7SkA4qVUjyJ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGearEkT4lNIS36YERAiJsAKCW+XMvPp/u0qi8TZZtl1Akrg6V1ACgs3Qn SaByIA8g21uc6MIJ/BslcCw= =TyBM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tzd9PhiR7SkA4qVUjyJ1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list