From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-24422-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1I0MQW-0007hp-0F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:58:12 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l5IIubRX019136; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:56:37 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-185-105.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.185.105]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5IIs6sZ015836 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:54:06 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F066E2480E2 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:42:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1VuDqxlFiwr for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:42:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.51] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAD9248079 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:42:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: QA issue: No stable skype in Tree From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.06.18.08.58.00@cox.net> References: <46701D06.5080302@gentoo.org> <20070617140632.GB7280@localhost.localdomain> <46758047.3050608@gentoo.org> <f540sd$m5a$2@sea.gmane.org> <pan.2007.06.18.08.58.00@cox.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-q3BAnTXOL+j2ws4KWT6T" Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:50:51 -0700 Message-Id: <1182192651.14981.43.camel@workbox.quova.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Archives-Salt: 544c8785-a1cd-4dc4-acdc-0136e894c96c X-Archives-Hash: 57e761d5a25fa3b0501cdc9bab590073 --=-q3BAnTXOL+j2ws4KWT6T Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:58 +0000, Duncan wrote: > So at this point it's pretty much up to the maintainer. Why are the rest= =20 > of us still discussing it? Because, like everything else, too many people on this list have to get in the last word. Also, there's nothing in our policy that really keeps skype from going stable, as I see it. It doesn't *have* to remain in testing, it would just end up more convenient for the maintainer that way, and if he decides to go that route, I fully support it, even though it does mean dropping stable KEYWORDS on a package in the tree (which *is* against policy and I suspect the reason this discussion was started). --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-q3BAnTXOL+j2ws4KWT6T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGdtQLkT4lNIS36YERAorLAJ9egb6hkMwORQ9VqA552nhkGpRi1QCffXYF n0L9LqBlhFlXgNGMvRpJm6s= =ABbP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-q3BAnTXOL+j2ws4KWT6T-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list